社区黑料

Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for 社区黑料 Newsletter

A federal judge on Thursday blocked President Donald Trump鈥檚 executive order to eliminate the Education Department and ordered officials to reinstate the jobs of thousands of federal employees who were laid off en masse earlier this year. 

Judge Myong J. Joun of the District Court in Boston in the preliminary injunction that the Trump administration had sought to 鈥渆ffectively dismantle鈥� the Education Department without congressional approval and prevented the federal government from carrying out programs mandated by law. 

Trump administration officials have claimed the March layoffs of more than 1,300 federal education workers were designed to increase government efficiency and were separate from efforts to eliminate the agency outright, claims that Joun deemed 鈥減lainly not true.鈥� 

鈥淒efendants fail to cite to a single case that holds that the Secretary鈥檚 authority is so broad that she can unilaterally dismantle a department by firing nearly the entire staff, or that her discretion permits her to make a 鈥榮hell鈥� department,鈥� Joun, a Biden appointee, wrote. 

Combined with early retirements and buyouts offered by the administration, the layoffs left the Education Department with about half as many employees as it had when Trump took office in January. That same month, Trump signed an executive order calling on Education Secretary Linda McMahon to 鈥渢ake all necessary steps to facilitate the closure of the Department of Education.鈥�

The Trump administration has acknowledged it cannot eliminate the 45-year-old department 鈥� long a goal of conservatives 鈥� without congressional approval despite layoffs that have left numerous offices unstaffed. Yet there is 鈥渘o evidence鈥� the Trump administration is working with Congress to achieve its goal or that the layoffs have made the agency more efficient, Joun wrote. 鈥淩ather, the record is replete with evidence of the opposite.鈥� 

鈥淎 department without enough employees to perform statutorily mandated functions is not a department at all,鈥� he said. 鈥淭his court cannot be asked to cover its eyes while the Department鈥檚 employees are continuously fired and units are transferred out until the Department becomes a shell of itself.鈥�

The White House didn鈥檛 respond to requests for comment. The Education Department said it plans to appeal. 

In a statement, Education Department spokesperson Madi Biedermann blasted the court order and called Joun 鈥渁 far-left Judge鈥� who overstepped his authority and the plaintiffs who filed the lawsuit to halt the layoffs 鈥� including two Massachusetts school districts and the American Federation of Teachers 鈥� 鈥漛iased.鈥� Also suing to stop the layoffs is 21 Democratic state attorneys general. 

鈥淧resident Trump and the Senate-confirmed Secretary of Education clearly have the authority to make decisions about agency reorganization efforts, not an unelected Judge with a political axe to grind,鈥� Biedermann said. 鈥淭his ruling is not in the best interest of American students or families. We will immediately challenge this on an emergency basis.鈥�

Cutting the federal education workforce in half 鈥� from 4,133 to 2,183 鈥� undermines its ability to distribute special education funding to schools, protect students鈥� civil rights and provide financial aid for college students, plaintiffs allege. They include the elimination of all Office of General Counsel attorneys, who specialize in K-12 grants related to special education, and most lawyers focused on student privacy issues. Plaintiffs also allege the cuts hampered the agency鈥檚 ability to manage a federal student loan program that provides financial assistance to nearly 13 million students across about 6,100 colleges and universities. 

The Office for Civil Rights was among those hardest hit by layoffs, with seven of its 12 regional offices shut down entirely. The move has left thousands of pending civil rights cases 鈥� including those that allege racial discrimination and sexual misconduct 鈥� in limbo. 

Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, called the temporary injunction the 鈥渇irst step to reverse this war on knowledge.鈥� Yet the damage is already being felt in schools, said Jessica Tang, president of the American Federation of Teachers Massachusetts. 

鈥淭he White House is not above the law, and we will never stop fighting on behalf of our students and our public schools and the protections, services and resources they need to thrive,鈥� Tang said in a media release.

In interviews with 社区黑料 Thursday, laid-off Education Department staffers reacted with cautious optimism. It remained unclear if, or when, they might return to their old jobs 鈥� or if they even want to go back. 

Keith McNamara, a laid-off Education Department data governance specialist, said he鈥檚 鈥渢empering my enthusiasm a bit鈥� to see if Joun鈥檚 order is overturned on appeal. But he said he was 鈥� a lot more hopeful than I was yesterday鈥� about the potential for the department to return to the way it operated prior to the cuts. 

For federal workers, he said the challenges have been ongoing and monumental, saying the last few months without work have 鈥渂een very chaotic.鈥� 

鈥淚t鈥檚 been very difficult to look for other work because tens of thousands of us are all pouring into the job market at the same time,鈥� he told 社区黑料. 鈥淚t鈥檚 been very stressful.鈥� 

Rachel Gittleman, who worked as a policy analyst in the financial aid office before getting terminated, called the court order on Thursday 鈥渁 really broad rebuke on the administration鈥檚 attempt to shut down this critically important department.鈥� 

鈥淏ut in many ways, the damage has already been done鈥� as fired employees begin to find new jobs, Gittleman said, and Education Department leadership works to push people out.  

McNamara said it was unclear Thursday whether the department would order fired employees back to work. Nearly his entire team was eliminated, he said, so it was uncertain what work he might do if he returned to the job. Asked if he was interested in doing so, he responded 鈥淚鈥檇 have to really think about that.鈥�

鈥淨uite frankly, I don’t think this administration is taking the job that the Education Department is supposed to be doing very seriously,鈥� he said. 鈥淚鈥檓 not sure I鈥檇 want to work for an agency that 鈥� from the very top 鈥� is hostile to the work that the department does.鈥�

Did you use this article in your work?

We鈥檇 love to hear how 社区黑料鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.