high school – ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ America's Education News Source Thu, 24 Sep 2026 17:49:51 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 /wp-content/uploads/2022/05/cropped-74_favicon-32x32.png high school – ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ 32 32 Inside Alpha School’s ‘Bootcamp’: Heart Monitors, Unpaid Labor & Many, Many Tweets /article/inside-alpha-schools-bootcamp-heart-monitors-unpaid-labor-many-many-tweets/ Fri, 25 Sep 2026 10:30:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1039382 This fall, as students at the private, AI-focused Alpha School begin their academic year, many are being tested in an unusual way: they’re watching a video of their parents “talking about our worst qualities,” according to one student, while hooked up to a heart monitor.

To pass the test, they must not let their heart rate rise by more than 10%.

Students also must find a “dirty job” — cleaning public restrooms, mucking horse stalls or clearing restaurant grease traps — and do it for several days without pay. Students say they’re required to record themselves doing the work without complaining. Complain and they’ll fail.


Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ Newsletter


The tasks are part of a “Bootcamp” running through the first eight weeks of high school at the private K-12 network. And the revelations, as well as others, come not from an investigation into the school but from students’ own tweets. 

First reported earlier this month in the newsletter by AI skeptic Benjamin Riley, founder of an education think tank of the same name, the tweets shed new light on a school that has long been a , especially among the Silicon Valley elite. 

The private school — its tagline is “School is broken” — is encouraging students to tweet about their experiences. Alpha curates the tweets . And for bootcamp students, tweeting isn’t optional: they must gain 100 “authentic” Twitter followers — “not purchased, not bots, not friends” — by Oct. 9 “or we fail,” according to one student.

An Alpha spokesperson did not respond to requests for details about the challenges or other issues. But in a posted Sept. 23, Riley quoted a student who said those who don’t complete Bootcamp within the allocated time “would get put into the ‘Pirate Ship,’” a segregated space reserved for students whose academics lag behind. Being relegated there, the student said, brought fewer privileges, including missing out on workshops. “It’s a morbid term but … [it was] pretty much a concentration camp of students. Until they were up to the standards of what Alpha wanted us to be.”

In a , Alpha said Bootcamp tasks are “not one-time, pass-or-fail tests. Though failure is an intentional and expected part of Bootcamp, students have unlimited opportunities to try again, apply what they learned, and keep working until they demonstrate mastery.”

The website listed 18 “tests” — a few students have said they’ve been given 21 — and notes that Bootcamp also includes more conventional activities such as delivering a filmed keynote of “who you intend to become by graduation” and finding a local non-profit with a “real problem” and using AI to build them a working solution.

U.S. Education Secretary Linda McMahon last year toured the flagship Austin campus and called the model the “” thing she’d seen in education in a long time. McMahon said she wanted to look at ways to Alpha’s methods into public schools.

U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon, Alpha School Co-Founder MacKenzie Price and Mike Morath, Texas Education Commissioner, participate in a roundtable discussion at Alpha School Austin on Sept. 9, 2025. (Rick Kern/Getty Images)

Founded in 2014 in Austin, Texas, by MacKenzie Price and Brian Holtz, Alpha is now led by tech entrepreneur . Its signature strategy is known as , in which students work through adaptive software each morning with an AI tutor to learn basic academics — its creators say that enables students to “crush academics in just 2 hours a day and motivates them with the gift of time.” Students spend the rest of the day in life skills workshops, tackling entrepreneurship, public speaking, coding and the like. Teachers are called “guides,” and roughly two-thirds come to the job without formal teaching credentials, according to one . 

Alpha students, Price has said, learn “twice as fast” as typical students, with the top 20% learning 6.5 times faster. “My mission is that I want parents to understand that their kids do not need six hours of sitting in a class all day to get their academics done,” Price told magazine in 2024.

Tuition runs from about $10,000 to $75,000. The network has expanded rapidly from a handful of campuses to roughly 50 locations nationwide this fall.

With the arrival of the new Texas private-school voucher system, Alpha has nearly quadrupled the number of schools in the state to more than 30 virtual and in-person campuses, most of which can now accept the taxpayer-supported vouchers.

None of Alpha’s schools were required to meet state curriculum standards or show how the company’s model would lead to student success to gain approval, ProPublica and The Texas Tribune earlier this month.

Meanwhile, Alpha’s founders have repeatedly failed to expand the network’s reach into publicly funded charter schools: Of 10 states where it has sought charters, only one state, Arizona, has approved their plans. The Texas State Board of Education rejected Alpha’s application in 2025, with one member saying he was “just a little skeptical” of its claims to large gains in the two-hour timeframe.

In Pennsylvania, state officials also a proposal to establish a so-called Unbound Academy cyber charter school, saying they found “multiple, significant deficiencies” in the plan. 

In North Carolina, one charter school board member in 2024 feared the two-hour learning window was “not nearly enough” to teach required subjects, while a Utah official said Alpha’s instructors seemed more “life coach” than teacher.

The charter effort, meanwhile, has come under . In a widely circulated posted in January 2025, educator and instructional designer Dan Meyer noted that in its Arizona application, Alpha had budgeted $1,000 per student annually for marketing costs, fully half of the estimated $2,000 per student for academics. He also noted that while it claimed that its 2 Hour Learning program showed strong results at an Alpha campus in Brownsville, TX, which it said serves “students from underprivileged backgrounds,” tuition there is $15,000, “which is not a definition of ‘underprivileged’ I am familiar with.”

‘Cramming isn’t learning’

While Alpha has said it’s bringing advances in cognitive science to the schools’ curriculum, it’s not clear to what extent those advances show up in Bootcamp. The school has retained several high-profile in the , but students this fall say the bootcamp often requires them to make progress entirely on their own, with no adult guidance or supervision.

In late August, one 15-year-old tweeted that Alpha “gave us 5 days to teach ourselves an entire AP unit with zero lectures and no study guide. … Instead of waiting for a teacher to hand out chapter questions, we had to pull the official AP syllabus, use AI to break down the hardest concepts, and build our own master study system from scratch.”

By the end of the week, the student said, “we had to sit down and take the official AP exam to prove we could score a 5 on our own.”

The student added, “Most schools test how well you remember what someone told you on Tuesday. When you know how to build your own syllabus and teach yourself college material, you realize traditional classes just move too slow.”

A few days earlier, another student tweeted, “I have to raise my SAT score 150 points by October 9th, completely on my own. No tutor holding my hand, no one checking in, just me and my computer.” 

While many commenters on Twitter have encouraged these students over the past few weeks, urging them to strike out on their own and learn all they can independently, a few aren’t so sure. One retired AP macroeconomics teacher wrote: “You are missing the richness of a voice leading you to lifelong mastery.”

Another suggested that the school should ask Bootcamp students to take the AP test “without notice” near the end of the school year to see what they retained, adding, “cramming isn’t learning.”

The Bootcamp’s emphasis on hitting arbitrary goals could be problematic, educators say, playing on students’ desire to please adults but ignoring their inward desire to learn about a given topic. That could result in students who hit their marks but learn less than they could.

Teacher, writer and blogger said the two strategies — extrinsic and intrinsic motivation — are not easy to tease apart.

“Is a student studying for a test because they want the grade, or because they want to understand things deeply?” he wrote in an email. “It’s not easy in practice to tell. Most people are motivated by a mix of both intrinsic and extrinsic reasons. I’m sure that’s the same for Alpha’s students.” 

To make things more complex, he said, students “often internalize external motivators,” with high test scores, for instance, integrated into our own value systems as good things. 

“What seems distinctive about Alpha’s bootcamp to me isn’t the reliance on extrinsic motivators. It’s the value system these motivators represent, along with the use of clear quantitative benchmarks to measure them. Most schools don’t care if you know how to use social media, and even if they did, they’d be unlikely to require you to get one hundred followers.”

‘My hands were shaking the entire rest of the afternoon’

On its website, Alpha said the heart rate test challenges students to take in “at least three pieces of honest, critical feedback” calmly and “bring your heart rate back within 10% of your resting baseline. It is a lesson in hearing hard truths without shutting down.”

Writing about the heart-rate test, one student called it “another horror story I get to experience” on Aug. 31, noting, “a video of my parents criticizing me will be played in front of the entire school. yay.”

Another student provided perhaps the best description of the challenge, noting on Sept. 1 that she’d been assigned to write 10 questions to ask her parents. Her list includes several extremely personal, difficult questions, such as: “If I don’t change one thing about myself in the next five years, what will this cost me?” “What’s a compliment people give me that you don’t fully agree with?” and “What’s something I say I want that my actions don’t actually support?” 

Posting on Twitter , one parent said the exercise worried him at first, but he noted that his son “came to me with deeply personal questions about who he was becoming as a young man and how he could grow … questions he hadn’t exactly asked me before.”

He said the exercise led to a long conversation “where I answered critically but did so also with kindness and a focus on growth.” Very little of what he said, the father noted, was shared with the school or his son’s class.

“The heart monitor was probably meant to make the exercise feel like a game,” he wrote. “While I can’t speak for every family, all I know is that this brought me closer to my son.”

One student who went through the experience said on Twitter that students watched the videos in small groups of five to 15 people and concluded, “Funniest 30 minutes ever. Parents would say harsh feedback, and we’d simply laugh it off.” 

The student said she suffers from “terrible anxiety” but that the exercise “made me step out of my comfort zone allowing me to realize the harsh feedback I may receive in front of others will never be as bad as I make it to be.”

By contrast, another student, featured in Riley’s newsletter, tweeted that they “barely made the cutoff by one single beat, and my hands were shaking the entire rest of the afternoon.” The tweet has since been deleted.

Students are also asked to endure a three-day wilderness experience similar to an Outward Bound trip. Alpha calls it a “survival-style challenge.” One student posted a photo of a tent in the woods with the caption: “I’m spending three days in the wilderness and still coming to terms with it. In a couple weeks, we will be dropped in the middle of nowhere with only 3 bags of rice and a tent. I would consider myself a strong leader in difficult situations, but @alphaschool is putting that to the test.”

In addition, students must watch a full season of the reality TV show and analyze the players’ decision-making.

Other students have detailed the “Grit & Hard Work Challenge,” with one calling it “an unglamorous job with zero pay.” The student said that could entail deep-cleaning public restrooms or restaurant kitchens. “You record yourself narrating out loud through the entire shift, and the full transcript gets run through an audit,” the student tweeted. Alpha’s site notes that to pass, “the transcript must contain zero instances of complaining or victim language.”

The student seemed at least curious about the task, adding that while most high schools “talk about character building during morning announcements,” Alpha “puts you in the dirtiest job you can find to see how your mindset holds up under real discomfort.”

Another was more blunt, saying that by the end of September they’d have to, among other tasks, “Volunteer cleaning horse shit and not complain — I’ll be mic’d.”

In her , author and longtime ed-tech skeptic Audrey Watters said Alpha School’s appeal “is to parents who believe their child is the next genius tech entrepreneur billionaire. But it is damaging in its own right. AlphaSchool, as we can see in the details of the bootcamp, actively demands students mold their behavior and their identity, in this case into some sort of John Galt figure,” a reference to the 1957 Ayn Rand novel Atlas Shrugged.

Watters said Alpha’s curriculum “leans into the kind of pseudoscience that litters the pages of bestselling ‘get rich quick books’ — psychological pseudoscience, economic pseudoscience alike — and the ideology of Silicon Valley’s startup hustle. All of this is the kind of messaging you can regularly find on social media, no surprise, since this seems to be a school fixated on the anti-expertise of influencer-culture, the sociopathy of tech-culture: move fast and break things.”

In a note published by Riley earlier this month, educator and author said most of what she might say in response is “unpublishable.”

If the accounts are accurate, she said, “someone there needs to be reminded that teenagers are children. They are not soldiers in an army, they are not adults at a business school, they are not workers in a pressure cooker environment.”

A former Wall Street trader, Fernandez said she and her colleagues “were not treated as these students appear to be. Especially dark is the biometric monitoring, which sounds like something a CIA trainee would be subjected to.”

The surveillance and pressure to achieve that most other students experience are on a “new and unheard of level” at Alpha, she said. If, as they’ve indicated, they want to use the school as a model for others nationwide, Fernandez said, “I’m profoundly disturbed.”

]]>
Opinion: Without Part-Time Jobs or School Clubs, Teens Miss Out on Basic Life Skills /article/without-part-time-jobs-or-school-clubs-teens-miss-out-on-basic-life-skills/ Fri, 04 Sep 2026 14:30:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1037990 As teenagers return to school this fall, a new report suggests that many of them are moving through adolescence without the experiences that help prepare them for adulthood, activities like a part-time job, a club, a team and a regular family meal.

The clearest evidence is teen employment, which alone has been for nearly 50 years. 


Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ Newsletter


The , “A Digital Divide in American Adolescence,” by Daniel Cox of the American Enterprise Institute’s Survey Center on American Life, was published in mid-August. It draws on the results of the , whose interviews were conducted in January and February with teens aged 13 to 17. 

The study’s first key finding is that the bottom rung of the career ladder is disappearing. A generation ago, a summer job or an afterschool shift was a routine rite of passage. It was a place where teenagers learned to show up on time, take direction from someone who wasn’t a parent or teacher and get paid for reliability rather than talent. But today, only 15% of teens in the survey reported having a part-time job, and just 28% even among 16- and 17-year-olds — the group most likely to work. Bureau of Labor Statistics show teen labor force participation peaked at nearly 58% in the late 1970s and has been falling ever since. 

The survey also shows that even within adolescence itself, opportunities for growth become rarer as students age. Travel sports participation among boys falls from 52% in early adolescence to 35% by age 16 or 17; choir and band participation among girls falls from 30% to 17%; and only 7% of teens are in student government or debate.

None of these activities is glamorous. But they’re the low-stakes, repeatable settings where teenagers practice commitment, teamwork and how to lose gracefully. They’re the soft infrastructure that makes a first real job, internship or semester of college survivable rather than disorienting.

When that infrastructure thins out, an shows up later. Employers often young workers lack basic job skills. The real problem is many never had the chance to practice them.

The AEI survey’s second finding is that this erosion isn’t evenly distributed. Teens with college-educated parents participate in extracurriculars at roughly double the rate of peers whose parents didn’t attend college. Nearly 1 in 4 are in an academic club, compared with 13% of teens whose parents didn’t attend college. And they’re three times as likely to be in student government or debate.

Screen time follows the same pattern in reverse. Teens spend, on average, close to three hours a day on social media. But neither is that time evenly distributed. Girls raised in households without a college-educated parent spend more time on more apps and are less likely to have tried cutting back than girls of parents with a degree. Boys in the same households log substantially more hours gaming.

Third, teens’ plans for what happens after high school are shifting, and shifting unevenly. Only 48% now plan to attend a four-year college, far short of being the near-default path for high school graduates. A separate the share of teens planning on any college — two- or four-year — fell from 73% in 2018 to 45% by 2024. The AEI survey reports 17% plan on a two-year or vocational program, 10% a full-time job and nearly 1 in 5 aren’t sure what’s next.

Those plans split sharply by gender and socioeconomic class, with 74% of girls with college-educated parents planning to attend a four-year school, versus 46% whose parents didn’t. 

A separate released in late August 2026, Gallup and the Walton Family Foundation’s fourth annual “Voices of Gen Z” poll, makes essentially the same point from inside the school building. Its sample of 14- to 18-year-olds is close to the age range AEI surveyed, and its findings closely track AEI’s.

No more than 20% of students feel “very prepared” for any specific path after high school, college, trade school, an apprenticeship or the job they want. Even among students planning to attend college, only 19% feel very prepared to do so.

When adults talk with students about their futures, those conversations are overwhelmingly about one path, with 52% of students saying adults have talked to them a lot about going to college. That’s compared with 17% discussing apprenticeships and 14% talking about jobs that don’t require a degree. This gap holds even among students who’ve already said they don’t plan to go to college.

Put together, the two surveys describe the same experience gap from two directions. AEI shows that fewer informal, out-of-school experiences that build real-world readiness are happening. Gallup/Walton shows that inside school, the guidance students receive is aimed almost entirely at one route, regardless of which one they’re headed toward.

Neither survey is describing a generation that’s lost interest in a good future. But both paint a picture of a generation that’s been given a narrower set of tools to reach it than it needs.

Here’s what school leaders and policymakers can do.

  • Treat work-based learning as core infrastructure, not as an elective add-on. States and districts should expand youth and paid internship pipelines that give students structured work experience during the school year.
  • Protect and expand school-based extracurriculars. This is especially important for teenagers whose families can’t supply the equivalent privately. The disparity in sports and club participation is a resource gap schools can partly close by keeping programs funded and accessible.
  • Focus on transportation and scheduling. The problem isn’t only motivation; much of the falloff in extracurricular participation among lower-income teens is logistical. Afterschool jobs and activities require rides and flexible hours many working families can’t provide.
  • Use state Workforce Pell and career-navigation funding to reach younger teens. Don’t just focus on juniors and seniors, and extend information beyond college advising. Guidance concentrated almost entirely on college leaves the majority of teens who won’t take it with less support.

None of this calls for panic, but it does call for attention. The teenagers in these surveys aren’t disengaged or unhappy in any dramatic sense. Most report being satisfied with their lives, their friendships, even their relationships with their parents. What they’re missing is practice and preparation for adulthood.

The back-to-school season is usually treated as a fresh start for academics. This survey data suggests it’s worth treating it as a fresh start for something schools have quietly let slide: the ordinary, unglamorous work of learning how to show up, and helping every teenager, not just those who are college-bound, see a clear path toward what comes next.

]]>
Opinion: What Districts Actually Need to Implement College & Career Pathways at Scale /article/what-districts-actually-need-to-implement-college-career-pathways-at-scale/ Thu, 27 Aug 2026 12:30:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1037571 In the past five years, there has been a surge in states playing a prominent role in improving outcomes for K-12 students. They’ve adopted evidence-based literacy policies, focused attention on , and invested public dollars to sustain . But gaining perhaps the most momentum across the country recently is state attention on .

The intention is good. But it’s not good enough.

A strong state policy can create urgency, define expectations and keep attention on what matters. But policies typically don’t recommend new schedules, establish guidelines for community partnerships, incentivize effective teacher training or help organize limited resources to achieve results.


Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ Newsletter


That work happens in districts and in schools. And if we ignore that work, even the strongest policy will produce uneven results.

from Louisiana shows that states can improve outcomes at scale when they provide clear direction, aligned incentives and sustained attention over time. In other words, states can’t simply pass better rules and wait for results. States must also provide districts with the nuts and bolts that translate policy into day-to-day practice.

If districts would just “do the thing,” so the logic goes, results would follow. My decades of experience helping districts implement ambitious change suggest a different reality: District leaders want more meaningful pathways to college and career. But they lack a workable blueprint to make these changes feasible.

Consider literacy. A state can adopt strong standards aligned with the science of reading, a high-quality curriculum and early screening. But a district still has hard questions to answer: Where will uninterrupted literacy time fit in the day? How will schools know which students need extra help, and when will they get it? Who provides intervention and how will reading specialists, tutors and classroom teachers work together instead of operating in isolation? What professional learning is essential? And — perhaps most challenging — what current work has to stop so that teachers aren’t buried under one more add-on initiative?

Those questions may sound mundane. But they are the difference between a reading policy that changes lives and one that produces new paperwork.

The same challenge is even more visible in high school, where states are increasingly promoting stronger college and career pathways. They’re asking for industry credentials, work-based learning and dual enrollment. These ideas have real promise. But they’re as complicated as literacy programs — maybe even more complicated — to design well.

In one district my nonprofit organization worked with, scheduling logistics meant that some students couldn’t participate in a pathway without sacrificing graduation requirements. In another district, the schools were simply too small and too remote to offer the range of pathways their students wanted. In another, it turned out that students’ lack of proficiency in reading, writing and math was preventing them from succeeding in career pathways. And in many districts, students must choose between a focus on academics and technical learning.

If states want these reforms to reach more students, especially students who have historically been furthest from opportunity, they need to treat implementation as a design challenge, not a compliance exercise. They must go beyond setting direction to enabling transformation.

That means doing a few things differently.

  • State guidance should include frameworks that explicitly address the district-level choices that matter the most. For literacy, there are tough decisions around scheduling, staffing, curriculum, teacher training and progress monitoring. For career pathways, district leaders have to consider course sequences, scheduling, partnerships, transportation, staffing, labor market alignment and an equal focus on strengthening foundational skills.
  • States should collect and share work being done in districts that are making progress. Leaders need to see the schedules, staffing models, course sequences, funding strategies and partnership agreements that prove it’s possible and that can be adapted to each leader’s unique context.
  • States should invest real dollars to support districts in redesigning existing systems — rather than layering a new initiative on top of old structures. They should provide technical assistance, tools or incentives that reward coherence rather than mere adoption.
  • States and districts need a clearer division of labor. States should focus on coherence and establishing guardrails. Districts should take the lead on making it work for their students, their teachers, and their local context.

Researchers have made progress in identifying what works. They know that when high school connects academic learning to life after graduation. They know that a focus on reading, writing and math proficiency in ninth grade . They know that simple credentialing requirements . And we know there’s still more to learn.

But the next challenge is not just discovering what works. It’s making what works feasible at scale.

If states and districts want career-pathway investments to change students’ lives, they have to pay as much attention to the machinery of implementation as they do to the promise of policy. That machinery may not make for a flashy press conference. But that’s where reform either becomes real for students—or doesn’t.

]]>
Hawaiʻi Freshmen Failing: Ninth Grade Repeater Rate Among Nation’s Highest /article/hawai%ca%bbi-freshmen-failing-ninth-grade-repeater-rate-among-nations-highest/ Fri, 21 Aug 2026 15:30:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1037182 This article was originally published in

High school came with more responsibility and less accountability for Josiah Ulukita. Courses were much harder, teachers were less strict about attendance and it was easier to skip school with friends or go on his phone during class, he said. 

Ulukita went from easily passing middle school to failing freshman English and social studies. After missing roughly half of his freshman year due to poor attendance, he found out he needed to repeat ninth grade. The shame of being held back led him to lose motivation and skip more school, he said, until his counselor warned him that he may not graduate on time. 


Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ Newsletter


“I was acing all my classes, and then I hit freshman year,” Ulukita said. “I thought it was going to be easy.”

More than a thousand students in Hawaiʻi share Ulukita’s experience each year. Roughly 1 in 10 students failed their freshman year in the state’s public high schools and had to repeat the grade in the 2021-2022 school year, the most recent year for which federal data is available. That’s more than double the national rate for this group of teens that year, according to an analysis of national data by Big Local News, an initiative of Stanford University.

In the school years since, the rate has decreased somewhat but remained high. In the 2024-2025 school year, 1 in 13 freshmen were held back, according to the state education department. 

Hawaiʻi’s status as a national outlier is made all the more jarring considering younger Hawaiʻi students rarely repeat a grade –  of elementary and middle schoolers overall. But that progress seems to come to a screeching halt in high school when more rigid requirements kick in to advance to the next level.

Other states like Mississippi and Florida are taking a more proactive approach to retention, holding students back as early as kindergarten through third grade. More than two dozen states require or allow schools to  who aren’t proficient in reading. Hawaiʻi has no such law on the books.

While research on the effects of retention is mixed, some studies find that students have better outcomes when they’re held back in their younger years and receive additional support to catch up academically to their peers. There’s little evidence that holding teens back in high school improves their learning, and some researchers argue that it actually hurts students’ chances of earning their diplomas.

“In earlier grades, basically grade retention could work if retention is supplemented with educational supports for these kids,” said Umut Ozek, a senior economist at RAND, a nonpartisan research and policy organization. “In contrast, in middle and high school, the evidence suggests that retention could actually harm students.” 

Hawaiʻi students and teachers attribute the high number of ninth graders being held back to a number of factors. Some say there’s more peer pressure to skip class and dodge assignments. Classes are harder and require students to have strong foundations in reading and math. Many students are unaccustomed to the strict credit requirements they need to fulfill to move to the next grade. 

“It’s a shock for the kids to understand that unless they receive a certain amount of credits, they can’t move on anymore,” said Dean Cevallos, principal at Keaʻau High School on the Big Island. 

Schools try to avoid holding students back by offering summer school, counseling, personalized learning plans and other resources, state education department Deputy Superintendent Heidi Armstrong said in a written statement. Freshman year can be academically challenging for some students, she said, and some teens might have challenges earning the credits they need to move on to 10th grade. 

The education department has declared a goal of promoting more freshmen to 10th grade by doubling down on students’ academic readiness and engagement beginning in middle school, according to its .

“The Department’s goal is to ensure students are prepared for continued academic success and remain on track toward earning a high school diploma,” Armstrong said.

Repeating ninth grade comes with consequences, including the possibility that students drop out without earning their diplomas. Some say the embarrassment of taking classes with younger students led them to attend school less frequently and fall further behind in their studies, while others said it motivated them to take their academics more seriously and catch up with their peers. 

Ulukita, who had to repeat ninth grade, was able to earn the credits he needed to complete both his freshman and sophomore year through additional courses, after-school work and a better attendance record. Now a junior at Kaimukī High School, Ulukita is on track to graduate with the rest of his peers in 2028. 

“You’ve got to lock in more, do all your classes, make sure you get all your credits and graduate on time,” Ulukita said. “You don’t want to be that super senior.”

Why Ninth Grade?

Freshmen must earn five credits – the equivalent of five yearlong classes – to move on to 10th grade. Most high school students take several classes during their freshman year, meaning that kids can fail one or two courses and still earn enough credits to move up. Students must continue to accumulate credits and pass their core classes throughout high school until they earn the  needed to graduate. 

When students repeat ninth grade, they’re not starting from scratch, said Elise Hannigan, Keaʻau High School’s Freshman Academy coordinator. Instead, students retake the freshman classes they failed but move on to 10th grade coursework whenever possible.

If students don’t have foundational academic skills by the time they get to high school, teachers say, it can make passing freshman classes more difficult. Students often take heavier course loads once they get to high school, and teachers may move through material more quickly. 

Students who scored below standards on eighth grade reading and math tests were less likely to pass all of their ninth grade courses and complete high school in five years, according to a 2024 report from , which studies students’ progress from preschool through college. 

It’s sometimes hard to determine if students are failing ninth grade because of academic or social issues, Hannigan said. 

If students attend school regularly, she said, they’re usually able to pass their classes, even if they need extra support from their teachers. But it’s difficult to get students up to speed if they’re not at school, she said, and teens may be less willing to engage in class if they already feel behind.  

“I would say, of the students who are not getting their five credits, the majority of them, it’s because they just have not been in school enough to do the work necessary to pass the classes,” Hannigan said. “If they’re not in school, it’s really hard to support a student.” 

Coming out of the pandemic, ninth graders were struggling academically, especially in math, said Kim Williamson, principal of Pāhoa High and Intermediate on the Big Island. At the time, the school was retaining nearly a quarter of its freshman class,  from the 2021-22 academic year. 

The school strengthened its academic support for its students, Williamson said, offering after-school tutoring and setting aside blocks of time for kids to receive extra instruction in reading and math. Because ninth grade algebra can be especially challenging for some students, he said, the school has created a pre-algebra course to make sure freshmen have foundational skills before they start on the high school coursework. 

“If they didn’t get a basic skill when they were younger, it does amplify as they get older,” Williamson said. 

In the 2024-25 academic year, the school’s ninth grade retention rate was 12%, a significant improvement from a few years ago.   

Lasting Effects

Shylyn Jimenez didn’t want to be at Leilehua High School in Wahiawā during her freshman year. She had been dealing with bullying since middle school and fell in with the wrong crowd, she said. When she needed to repeat the grade, she lost motivation to attend class and complete her course requirements.  

“The more I kept messing up in school, the more I didn’t care, and the more it made it easy to not show up,” she said. “In my head at that time, the things that I was doing outside of school were way more fun than school itself.” 

Some students say that repeating a grade comes with stigma and embarrassment, discouraging them from attending class and catching up to their peers. (Craig Fujii/Civil Beat/2026)

Only 57% of students who failed two or more classes in ninth grade completed high school in five years, compared to the state average of 89%, . Roughly 12% of freshmen who enroll in Hawaiʻi high schools  within four years, although the education department doesn’t specify how many of these students had to repeat a grade.

After her freshman year, Jimenez appeared in court for truancy. She was referred to an alternative learning program, which offered extended school days and year-round classes for kids who fall behind and need significant help catching up on their credits. While she initially resisted coming to class, the staff never gave up on her – sometimes showing up at her house to make sure she came to school.  

“I needed somebody to tell me, ‘If you don’t get your ass in school, there’s going to be consequences,’” Jimenez said. 

It took Jimenez an extra year to complete high school, but she earned her diploma last year and is now enrolled in a cosmetology program at Honolulu Community College.It’s hard to say how repeating ninth grade affects student achievement, said Francisco Martorell, a professor at the University of California Davis School of Education. Most studies focus on students who were held back in elementary or middle school. 

Generally, holding older students back can negatively affect their chances of completing high school and enrolling in college, said Ozek, the senior economist at RAND. Schools run the risk of students aging out before they earn their diplomas, meaning they can drop out at any time, and the stigma of repeating a grade may be stronger among older students. 

“The bottom line is grade retention in later grades, especially in high school,” he said, “is not really a good idea.”

Gearing Up For High School

At Keaʻau High School, students’ transition to ninth grade starts weeks before the school year begins.

Incoming freshmen spend three weeks on campus in June taking classes, learning how to participate in clubs and athletics and painting a class mural in the ninth grade building. The most recent addition was a gray and white shark sternly folding its arms, surrounded by maroon and black block letters reading “2030 SHARKS.” 

While the program isn’t mandatory, it typically draws 80 to 90 students – roughly 30% of the incoming freshman class. The summer initiative focuses on helping students develop a strong sense of belonging and community with their peers, which can translate to better attendance and lower retention rates during the school year, Hannigan said.

Typically, she said, around 6% of students need to repeat ninth grade at Keaʻau. 

Over the summer, freshman Tristan Hanley was worried about choosing the right classes and adjusting to Keaʻau’s campus before entering the school’s summer transition program. He came out of the program excited to join the school’s band program and football team and had gotten to know some of his teachers.

At Keaʻau High School, incoming freshmen spend a few weeks on campus during the summer to build a stronger sense of community. Activities include painting a class mural in the freshman building. (Tim Wright/Civil Beat/2026)

“It just allowed me to see all of these new opportunities at the school and hear about them and try them out a little bit too,” Hanley said.  

While many schools are trying to ease students’ transition to ninth grade, some challenges start well before teens enter high school, prompting national debates on whether kids should be held back earlier.

Danni-Cheree Lee’s son began falling behind in elementary school. He frequently asked to stay home from school and felt ashamed to ask for help in class, she said. 

Despite his struggles, Lee’s son continued progressing through the grades until his attendance issues caught up to him in middle school, when he needed to repeat sixth and seventh grade. At the time, Lee was dealing with back and neck issues and didn’t have a car, she said, so it was hard to force her son to attend school.

Lee said her son might have benefited from being held back earlier, when his elementary school first began noticing problems with his attendance. While repeating grades in middle school gave him more time to learn the material, he also experienced teasing as his classmates noticed he had fallen behind.

Principals rarely hold kids back before high school and tend to have more discretion around student retention in the younger grades. The Hawaiʻi Board of Education only specifies that schools must promote students based on their  and social development, and students must  like English, math, science and social studies to complete middle school. 

At Jarrett Middle School in Pālolo Valley, Principal Reid Kuba said it’s a balancing act when deciding whether to move some students up to high school. Teachers offer after-school classes and summer school to prepare students as much as possible for ninth grade, he said, but he also knows that students who need to repeat a grade in middle school face a greater risk of aging out of the system before they earn their diploma.   

“For me, and I think all the middle school principals, that’s the main thing, is trying to get them to graduate,” Kuba said. “So they’re not only looking at grades, but their age.” 

Ideally, Kuba said, it would be beneficial for some kids to repeat a grade when they’re much younger, such as kindergarten or first grade, when they’re developing fundamental skills and less aware that they’re a year behind their peers.

Hawaiʻi’s ninth grade retention rate has improved, but 1 in 13 kids are still held back every year. (Civil Beat Photo Illustration/Kevin Fujii/2026)

For Lee’s son, the turning point came when he enrolled in an alternative learning program, where the classes were smaller and teachers were strict about attendance, she said. Having adults who genuinely cared about his education motivated him to complete his high school classes and explore new topics like finance, she said. 

Even though he fell behind in middle school, he earned enough credits to graduate on time with the rest of his peers in 2022. 

“I do not think any child should have to wait to be held back once in high school because that’ll make it worse,” Lee said. “Imagine how much schooling, how far behind they are in these subjects, and then they’re only going to be given four years to catch up on everything.” 

 about being held back was produced in partnership with Big Local News and The Hechinger Report. Data analysis was conducted by Eric Sagara, senior data journalist with Big Local News.

. Civil Beat’s education reporting is supported by a grant from Chamberlin Family Philanthropy.

]]>
Student Journalists: AI Is Changing Our Work — And Not For the Better /article/student-journalists-ai-is-changing-our-work-and-not-for-the-better/ Thu, 20 Aug 2026 10:30:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1037149 In the nearly four years since generative artificial intelligence began colonizing the academic lives of teens, it has changed the experience of school for millions of young people. Perhaps no group has watched their reality shift more than student journalists.

Just as the technology has rewired the relationship between young writers-in-training and their teachers, it has also changed how student journalists and their editors work together — or, in some cases, don’t. 

And AI has created headaches for these journalists that mirror those afflicting their professional peers, with school newsrooms struggling to figure out how to respond.

As with their schools more broadly, student newsrooms have spent these years deploying surveillance software and, in many cases, drafting zero-tolerance policies for AI. Different newsrooms have developed different answers to the same basic question: How much do we trust teenagers to not let a chatbot do their work? 

ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ spoke recently to three student journalists from three very different newsrooms about their experiences:

  • Cid Frydman, a rising senior at Berkeley High School in California, who writes for the ;
  • Veronica Mollod, a rising senior and current events editor at , the student newspaper at the High School of American Studies at Lehman College in the Bronx, N.Y.;
  • Tova Weiss, a recent high school graduate in Ann Arbor, Mich., who has split her time between Pioneer High School and . Weiss has written and edited for the and , a publication written by and for Jewish teens.

Here are eight-and-a-half ways — including one counterintuitive, not-for-attribution observation — in which AI is changing their realities:

1. In a few schools, AI has overturned the culture of newspapers.

Frydman, the Berkeley student, said strict AI use policies at her publication have bred resentment among student writers. 

“I think a lot of the people higher up on my paper, and in journalism in general, don’t have a lot of trust in writers anymore, especially with so many AI resources that are out there,” she said. 

Editors are “very harsh on writers” over worries that they’ll use AI, keeping strict controls over documents, she said. They’ll poke around writers’ search histories and analyze their typing speed and word choices, matching drafts to previous work. 

“It’s very strict when you put it all together,” Frydman said. “They don’t have a lot of faith in our ability to actually produce real journalism, and so just assume the worst automatically, which can be a little frustrating when you’re just trying to do your best as a writer.”

At the Berkeley High newspaper, staffers have been let go over suspected AI use. 

Frydman sees the high cost of such heavy-handed policies: “We’re here because we love journalism,” she said. “We’re here to write about things that we’re hopefully passionate about, and the heavy approach of ‘There’s no tolerance whatsoever,’ and not even giving writers the grace and the trust to make their own decisions and do this work on their own — just minding it and monitoring it so heavily, I think it’s very discouraging.”

More broadly, getting caught using AI to write academic assignments carries weighty consequences, she said. You’re unable to get a letter of recommendation from any teacher, Frydman said. 

And a single infraction travels fast: Get caught using AI once, she said, and teachers will tell all of their colleagues “to watch out because this student has used AI before — they might use it in your class.”

2. AI is changing how — and how much — students write.

Cid Frydman

Frydman said she’s adopting what’s basically a minimalist approach to writing these days, holding back details so she doesn’t draw suspicion from editors or teachers. 

Though she doesn’t use AI for writing, she said, “A lot of times, I find myself sort of slimming down my writing to not go so into detail on things because it’ll be suspected to be something that’s not original. You don’t have a lot of room to be creative in this process, so it’s definitely been a little challenging.”

Ann Arbor’s Weiss said she’s also seeing many young journalists “adjust their writing voice” to avoid being flagged as relying on AI. Many students, she said, now intentionally add typos to their writing to support its legitimacy. “It’s absolutely devastating to watch how many people are intentionally damaging or diminishing the quality and authenticity of their work,” she said. 

At Berkeley High, school-issued Chromebooks are locked down to block access to ChatGPT, Claude and other major AI tools outright — and any attempt to reach them gets flagged. “It notifies the teacher through this program that we have called Go Guardian, which is embedded into a lot of the Chromebooks, where they can sort of see what you’re doing and be able to call you out on it,” Frydman said.

3. A few newsrooms are writing AI policies.

At Youth Environmental Press Team, where Weiss is an editor, staffers have been talking “in pretty much every director’s meeting” about the implications and problems surrounding AI. “We are an environmental publication, which means a lot of us are very climate-conscious.”

The environmental impacts of AI data centers are a cause of great concern, Weiss said.

After fielding a wave of questions from reporters, the publication developed formal guidelines rather than instituting an outright ban on AI. “It was always very clear for us that we would not publish or even entertain the idea of publishing anything that was written by a chatbot or any kind of generative AI,” Weiss said. But they soon got queries from reporters asking if they could use AI for outlining, for formatting statistics, for interview transcriptions and the like.

Tova Weiss

The policy that emerged prohibits AI-written and AI-edited work, including work that heavily uses tools like Grammarly. But transcription services and basic spell-check are still allowed. 

The organization, she said, wants to make writing “as accessible as possible so people can have their work published — but not if that means it’s not really their work, and especially not if that’s at the cost of the environment.” 

4. Other newsrooms rely on experience and vibes.

Weiss helped craft the formal AI policy at the environmental journal. At jGirls+ Magazine, by contrast, she said there’s no written policy. But in practice the standard is clear: Submissions and even staff applications that appear to be AI-generated are not accepted. In one case, she recalled, an obviously AI-written editorial board application — with a stiff style that lacked personal voice — tested with an AI detector as 100% AI, “which was really something none of us had expected.”

Weiss said AI detectors should be used only “when there is already prior reason to suspect something might have been AI generated” — a student with a track record of misusing AI, for instance, or because something just simply reads a little “off.”

5. In most cases, AI detectors are widely seen as unreliable.

Weiss described a tiered system in the environmental outlet’s workflow, with writers operating on an “honor system” but with student editors flagging “sketchy” pieces such as those that are missing statistical sources or those that quote dubious ones — or writing that doesn’t sound like a typical teenager’s.

“The thing about student voices is typically each writer has a distinctive style of writing,” she said. “We’re high schoolers: We have typos, we make mistakes in there. And if we’re finding something that’s void of personal style or just generally reads in a way that doesn’t seem like it was written by a student, we’re going to look into that further.” 

But she and others worry that using an AI detector could unfairly flag strong writing as suspicious simply because it’s polished — a phenomenon that happens more than you’d think in many schools, Weiss suggested.

AI detectors aren’t really reliable, said Frydman, the Berkeley senior, “so even if you write something really well, it’ll just automatically assume that it might be AI and your writing will get flagged, which has happened to a lot of my friends.” 

6. A few simple rules can keep AI from taking over, journalists say.

Mollod, the New York City journalist, said a somewhat arcane editing rule at her publication basically serves to help keep AI-generated content at bay: At Common Sense, every article is required to include a quote from a student in each grade level — a structural feature that makes it hard for AI to intrude, since students typically remember what they’ve said to a reporter. 

7. In a few cases, teachers are using AI more than students.

The journalists described several instances in which teachers, not students, were the ones turning to AI, relying on the technology to formulate lesson plans, create assignments and grade them.

One student who asked not to be quoted directly spoke of a teacher who “will just copy and paste straight off of Chat GPT or Claude, and just give us assignments that are so clearly AI that it’s ridiculous.”

Others rely on it for grading assignments, which “leads to a lot of people getting unfair grades, because AI can mess up,” said the student.

The more teachers rely on the technology, “the easier it is to just forget that you’re there for a reason, you’re trying to do your job for a reason — and AI should not be teaching kids Spanish or English or math or anything like that. It can’t reproduce real thinking. So it’s definitely a little dystopian.”

8. For many students, refusing AI isn’t a school rule. It’s personal.

Weiss, the Ann Arbor writer, said she has never used Open AI’s popular ChatGPT, due to environmental concerns over data centers as well as personal concerns over AI more broadly. “It just does not align with my morals at all,” she said. 

But casual AI use has become normalized among many of her peers, she said, with students openly saying, sometimes within earshot of teachers, that they ran an assignment through a chatbot the night before it was due.

The best way to fight AI, she said, is basically to boycott it. “The strongest way anyone can combat artificial intelligence is just by refusing to have anything to do with it,” she said.

While AI-generated writing more broadly can damage the way that people learn and is worth thinking about, Mollod said, she’s not sure that it has gotten to the point where “just everyone is just cheating, and no one’s really actually taking their work seriously.”

Veronica Mollod

She reads the coverage and believes most people who don’t spend time in schools overestimate how much teens use AI. “People not in school are like, ‘Well, I didn’t have this great tool. If I had it, I wouldn’t have done anything,’” she said. But relying on the technology, which showed up in the middle of her eighth-grade year, isn’t yet common practice for most students she knows. 

Whether future students will warm to it more isn’t yet clear, Mollod said.

Weiss, the Michigan student, said her work — especially at the environmental publication — has taken on a new significance in the age of AI, pushing to celebrate and highlight “authentic youth journalism and youth narrative” in the face of encroaching technology. “In my view,” she said, “demonstrating our talents as humans and as youth is a form of silent protest against AI by proving that artificial intelligence isn’t necessary to produce professional-quality journalism.”

Bonus: Non-AI cheating abides. 

On background, one of the students said she thought a lot of the news coverage about AI cheating, while serious, simply misses the point. The old-fashioned kind of cheating, for now, remains much more common. In 2026, students are still relying on copying each other’s homework, just as generations before them did. 

“Mostly it’s just, like, circles of people, where there’ll be a math class and five people do the homework — and the other 20 got it from this person, [who] got it from this person, [who] got it from this person — which has always kind of been going on.”

]]>
Opinion: As Students Head Back to School, Let’s Rethink What’s Success in Sex Education /article/as-students-head-back-to-school-lets-rethink-whats-success-in-sex-education/ Tue, 11 Aug 2026 16:30:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1036662 As millions of young people head back to school this fall, parents are buying backpacks, teachers are preparing lesson plans, and policymakers are once again debating what belongs in the classroom.

One topic will predictably return to the center of those debates: sex education.


Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ Newsletter


Too often, the conversation begins and ends with one question: How do we prevent teenagers from becoming pregnant or acquiring sexually transmitted infections?

Young people are asking something different.

They want to know how to build healthy relationships, communicate boundaries, recognize misinformation, make decisions they feel good about, and imagine futures where their sexuality is a source of confidence rather than fear.

That disconnect matters.

While adults continue designing policies and programs around what we hope adolescents avoid, many young people are focused on who they hope to become.

For decades, our public conversation about adolescent sexual health has been dominated by prevention. Success is typically measured by declining pregnancy rates or lower rates of sexually transmitted infections. Those outcomes matter. They always will.

But they tell only part of the story.

If preventing harm is our only goal, we overlook the very capacities that help young people make healthy decisions in the first place: confidence, communication, agency, access to trustworthy information, supportive relationships and the ability to envision futures they value.

consistently shows that adolescents far more broadly than . They talk about respect, trust, communication, emotional readiness and feeling informed.

My own with Black adolescents supports this. Young people are eager for conversations about sexual health that extend beyond avoiding pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections. They want space to talk about relationships, pleasure, communication, consent, identity and how to navigate conflicting messages from peers, social media, families, and schools. 

For Black adolescents, this narrow focus is especially consequential. Their sexuality is too often approached through risk, control and surveillance rather than possibility, agency and support.

They are not simply asking for more information. They are asking for guidance that helps them make sense of that information, align decisions with their values and build healthy relationships. Those insights suggest that preparing young people for sexual well-being requires more than delivering facts. It requires equipping them with the skills, confidence and support to navigate the complexities of adolescence.

Yet these priorities rarely shape how we design programs, evaluate success or decide what belongs in the classroom.

examining three decades of school-based sex education shows that comprehensive programs can help young people develop healthy relationship skills, recognize misinformation, respect sexual diversity and strengthen their ability to recognize and respond to dating violence and sexual abuse. The most promising approaches are not one-time lessons focused only on risk. They are age-appropriate, inclusive and designed to build knowledge and skills over time.

But access to that kind of education still depends heavily on where a young person lives. In its , SIECUS: Sex Ed for Social Change gave only seven states grades an A, while more than one-quarter received an F. Oregon and Washington earned A grades. The scores reflect whether state policies support medically accurate information, contraception, healthy relationships and LGBTQIA+-inclusive instruction, among other measures.

State policies do not tell us exactly what happens in every classroom. Still, some school districts are showing what a broader approach can look like. uses a curriculum and supplemental lessons that address consent, communication and healthy relationships alongside pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection prevention. Families can preview the lessons and access resources to support conversations at home.

To be clear, preventing pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections remains critically important. No one is arguing otherwise.

But prevention should not be mistaken for the ultimate goal.

Back-to-school season reminds us what we expect education to accomplish. We don’t judge schools solely by whether students avoid dropping out. We also ask whether they are learning, growing, thinking critically and developing the skills they need to thrive.

Adolescent sexual health deserves the same standard.

Yet we continue to evaluate success largely by what young people don’t do. Did they avoid pregnancy? Did they avoid infection?

Those are important outcomes, but they are not the only ones that matter.

What if we also asked whether young people left school feeling more prepared? More confident communicating with a partner? Better able to recognize misinformation online? More equipped to make decisions that reflect their own values? More capable of building relationships grounded in mutual respect?

Schools and districts should evaluate whether students leave sex education better able to communicate, assess information, establish boundaries and make decisions consistent with their values, not only whether pregnancy and infection rates decline.

These are not “soft” outcomes. They are foundational skills that support lifelong sexual health and well-being.

Ironically, they are also some of the strongest tools for preventing the very outcomes our policies are designed to reduce.

The choice is not between prevention and well-being.

Well-being is one pathway to prevention. 

Expanding what schools teach and measure will require meaningful engagement with families. Parents should receive clear information about what will be taught, how lessons differ by grade level and how they can review the materials. Schools should make space for questions, communicate in the languages families use and be clear that sex education is not intended to replace conversations at home.

Schools and families have different but complementary roles. Schools can provide medically sound information and practical skills. Families can help young people understand that information in the context of their beliefs and values.

Schools should take parental concerns seriously without treating the loudest opposition as representative of all families. In a of Minnesota parents, approximately 90% said comprehensive sexuality education should be taught in schools. Where families have a legal right to opt their children out, schools can respect that right without allowing individual objections to narrow what is available to every student.

If we truly want healthier futures for young people, especially Black adolescents who too often encounter systems built around surveillance instead of support, then we have to stop asking only how to prevent harm.

We also need to ask how to prepare young people to flourish.

As students return to school this year, we should expect more from sex education than the absence of negative outcomes. Like every other part of education, it should give young people with the knowledge, skills, confidence, and agency they need to navigate the world they live in.

]]>
Students Convene to Hammer Out AI Bill of Rights for Schools /article/students-convene-to-hammer-out-ai-bill-of-rights-for-schools/ Fri, 24 Jul 2026 16:30:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1035800 BOSTON — Tatiyana Reaves got into trouble recently for writing a one-syllable word — and not the one you’d think.

Taking a computer class at her Fayetteville, N.C., high school, she handed in a paper with the offending word: .

“[The teacher] called me over, and she was like, ‘I don’t want to see you using AI,’ ” the 16-year-old rising junior recalled. If she’d asked, Reaves would have said she didn’t use AI to write the piece — that’s just the way she talks.


Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ Newsletter


“So it was kind of tense,” said Reaves, “and I was definitely upset because she gave me a zero for that assignment.” 

High school students, steeped for nearly the past four years in generative artificial intelligence, face this reality daily, attending class largely without a set of agreed-upon guidelines. Over the weekend, a small group of students came together to hammer out a few basic principles for the technology, something akin to an AI Bill of Rights.

Sponsored by a group that includes an and a national , 100 students from all 50 states gathered here to debate a first-of-its-kind set of recommendations, to be shared with district leaders nationwide as AI proliferates rapidly in the lives of both students and teachers.

The nonprofit , which brought the group together, didn’t make the final recommendations immediately available — they’ll be released in coming weeks. But students told ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ in interviews they are concerned about a host of problems: cheating, transparency, hallucinations, cognitive offloading, mental health and environmental factors, among others.

Two students from every state debated and ultimately approved the recommendations by a Senate-style roll call vote on Sunday at the Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate, a museum and conference center that features a of the U.S. Senate Chamber where Kennedy served from 1962 until his death in 2009.

Missouri student Jaelyn Jensen speaks from the podium during final debate on Sunday at the Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate. (Greg Toppo)

Despite the democratic nature of the proceedings, Day of AI refused to grant ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ access over three days to any of the student debates, save for the closing speeches and final vote. 

The organization also clamped down on the text of the proposal, refusing to release a draft that students spent nearly three days discussing freely.

By the time of Sunday’s debate and final vote, nearly 100 students sat in replicas of U.S. senators’ seats, paging through their copies of the bill as staff members and security personnel closely guarded the proceedings. A reporter who picked up a stray copy of the bill on an upholstered bench had the paper quickly snatched away by a staffer, while another swept the area for more copies, gathering them up and tucking them under an arm.

North Carolina students Dillian Campbell, center, and Tatiyana Reaves, right, listen as a student speaks about proposed AI recommendations. (Greg Toppo)

During the proceedings, a few participants called the proposal flawed or incomplete and even, at times, incoherent — one student referred to it as “a block of Swiss cheese.” But in the end he voted “Yea.” In all, 83 students approved the measure, with 15 opposed — two students weren’t present for the final vote.

‘It’s an easy way out’

In the students’ conception, Al literacy instruction should be mandatory as soon as they start using devices in the classroom. The lessons should focus not just on appropriate academic use but on misinformation, plagiarism, bias in Al systems, privacy, environmental impacts and how Al really works.

Ethan Liu, 17, a recent high school graduate from Morgantown, W.Va., said the recommendations are “pretty fair,” especially the section on students. “We basically outline that AI, with the proper supervision, is a great tool for brainstorming and studying,” he said. Liu was one of several students who spoke to ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ during breaks in the deliberations.

Liu recalled asking ChatGPT to create sets of practice problems. “That was one of the best ways that I would use to study for a test.”

But he said using AI to answer test questions or to generate art, for instance, is a bridge too far. The guidelines, Liu said, suggest that AI should be a tool “to help kids truly understand the topic without just spoon-feeding them the answer.”

Ethan Liu

In candid conversations throughout the weekend, students said AI is basically turning their school experience upside down, simultaneously supercharging their ability to learn while threatening to derail many of their classmates — and sowing mistrust between students and teachers.

“It’s an easy way out,” said James Baxter, 14, from St. George, Utah. “People like to know hard things, but learning it is a different story for most people.”

While he relies on tools like Google’s Notebook LM to help him create study guides, Dillian Campbell, 17, a rising senior in Fayetteville, N.C., said that when teachers pass out assignments, he most often sees classmates simply pull out their phones and snap a photo, asking AI to do the rest.

He recalled a math teacher telling students, “I don’t care if you use AI, but if you fail your test, that’s on you because you don’t really know the work.”

Jaelyn Jensen

Jaelyn Jensen, 17, a rising senior in Lee’s Summit, Mo., noted that early on in discussions, the group concluded that while limiting AI use for young students is crucial, giving middle- and high-schoolers more autonomy with AI makes sense. Teens, she said, need “to make their own decisions, to learn from their own mistakes with AI.” But schools must also teach them how to use it responsibly “and let them know that it is something that is going to be in their future.”

Lucia Herrera, 17, a classmate of Jensen’s from Missouri, said AI has even crept into the speech and debate world, with debaters asking ChatGPT to help them respond to questions about their cases — this, in a world where critical thinking and original voice are a key to success.

While she can make a case for AI aiding in research, Herrera said, “I think it just takes all of the human out of [it].”

Bihmanji Acho, 16, a rising junior from St. Cloud, Minn., said she’s most troubled by the ways in which she sees AI undermining interpersonal relationships. She recalled attending a recent summit in which adults said they use AI “at like two a.m. as a therapist. And I just don’t …” She paused for a moment. “It hurts my heart. I feel like it hurts my heart to hear that.”

Tatiyana Reaves

While — or is it whilst? — many might believe that AI offers a crutch for low-skill students, Reaves said we should think again: Many of those who use AI most are “super-smart kids that are, like, just checked out.”

That loss of student agency might be among the most pressing problems AI presents, said Gyimah Whitaker, of the Decatur, Ga., school district. That results in fewer students able to think critically and take risks.

Whitaker, who chaperoned two Georgia students to the event, said her 5,400-student district proudly embraces and the rigorous curriculum. But AI, Whitaker said, undermines the values in both systems, driving students toward completion rather than helping them master difficult tasks.

Gyimah Whitaker

Luckily, young people are, for now at least, fighting back. She noted that students in her district’s IB program “can be truly offended” if a teacher uses AI to grade their paper. They’ve even proposed a “three-strikes-and-you’re-out” AI rule — for teachers. 

To be sure, the students urged AI literacy for teachers, and Cynthia Breazeal, who directs MIT’s RAISE research program, said that’s no longer optional. 

Actually, the advent of generative AI may require more than just literacy. To truly combat the technology, she said, schools may need to adopt an entirely different pedagogical model, one that encourages students to more deeply engage with material.

She invoked legendary MIT mathematician and computer scientist , who co-developed the Logo programming language in the 1960s and founded what became MIT’s Media Lab. Papert helped popularize the term “” to describe the productive struggle learning something complex often requires. In his conception, children should be encouraged to build things and embrace difficulty, not shun or outsource it. Upon hearing a teacher describe the difficulties a child encountered programming in Logo once in the 1980s, he concluded, “I have no doubt that this kid called the work fun because it was hard rather than in spite of being hard.”

‘A Sputnik moment’?

Chase Johnson, 15, a rising junior in Kenai, Alaska, uses AI “a lot” in his personal life. These days, he said, it’s helping him develop a business to automate processes such as customer service. 

As if to prove it, he’ll pull out his phone to show off no fewer than 10 apps, all of which allow him to explore AI in different ways. “I do a lot of research,” he said.

Chase Johnson shows off a few of the AI apps on his phone. Though AI is banned at his high school in Kenai, Alaska, he relies on it for personal use. (Greg Toppo) 

But in his high school, he said, generative artificial intelligence is largely banned because of students using it to cheat.

Some of that responsibility should be borne by teachers, he said: In writing, for instance, instead of assigning essays that are easily outsourced to a bot, teachers should assign research projects that require students to present their findings in front of a class. “You can’t cheat your way out of that,” Johnson said.

Sarah Zahka, a rising junior in Weston, Fla., said she’s not above using AI when needed. “If I’m stuck on a math problem, I’ll ask it, ‘Hey AI, help me solve this problem step-by-step.’ ”

While she’s worried about AI causing students to lose foundational skills, sometimes she simply needs help brainstorming. In writing, Zahka said, she might ask an AI bot how to approach a topic, “but then I’ll write ethically on my own. Although I’m going to sound like a teenager writing an essay and I might not get the grade that the cheaters get, ultimately I’ll know what level I’m at.”

Jeff Riley, the former Massachusetts who now leads Day of AI, said he’s both excited by the technology’s possibilities — and a bit terrified. He predicted that AI could “kickstart the next revolution in education,” particularly with its ability to help teachers differentiate instruction and personalize learning. “But there’s some bad stuff with it too, right? Bias, voice clones, deep fakes, hallucinations, companions, energy concerns. The list goes on and on and on.”

While deadly serious, he said, those concerns aren’t activating enough adults — this should, by all rights, be “” pushing schools and communities forward, but he sees little urgency. He noted that in 2029, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s international PISA exam will for the first time assess . “I can almost guarantee you right now: American schoolchildren, 15-year-olds, are going to score 30th in the world on AI literacy — on a technology that was largely created in this country.”

On the flight back to Atlanta on Sunday night, Whitaker, the Georgia superintendent, recalled that the two students she accompanied told her they’d split their vote on the recommendations, one approving the plan and one voting No. The one who opposed the measure told her the proposal “didn’t meet the mark completely” and needed more work.

“I think that’s exciting,” Whitaker admitted. “What excites me is that our children are wrestling just like we are — and that level of inquiry as a superintendent is what you want to see in students every single day.”

]]>
Opinion: The Science of Reading Goes to High School /article/the-science-of-reading-goes-to-high-school/ Mon, 13 Jul 2026 12:30:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1035161 For anyone who cares about student literacy, the past few years have given us reason to cheer. While trends in , young people’s reading habits, and talk of a “” are clear causes for concern, there’s another side to the story. 

More than 40 states now mandate evidence-based reading instruction in public schools. The specifics in these new laws and regulations vary — most require that schools use high-quality curriculum based on the Science of Reading, many invest in new teacher training, and some ban discredited methods. But they all have one thing in common: a focus on the early grades. 


Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ Newsletter


In my nonprofit’s work supporting districts to implement new curriculum and instruction, we’ve seen educators work tirelessly to shift classroom practice. We’ve then seen them joyfully experience the positive impacts on teaching and learning. And we’ve been hearing a consistent question.

What about high school?

Time and again, school and district leaders would pose the same questions about grades 9-12 that we were exploring in K-8. They wanted guidance about what high-quality English curriculum should look like. They were looking for materials that would nurture literacy for older students, especially those who struggled with grade-level texts. They were asking: How could they identify well-designed materials that truly support strong English instruction in high school, especially as it relates to building knowledge through rigorous, content-rich texts?

At the same time, we were hearing from publishers. Some were expanding their programs for younger students to include high school English, while others were interested in strengthening existing materials. Several were just getting started developing something new. No matter where they were on this journey, publishers wanted thoughtful, evidence-based criteria and feedback to ensure their materials reflected the strongest research and instructional design principles. 

They weren’t simply looking for a rating — they wanted guidance that would help them build evidence-based curriculum that met the needs of high school teachers and students. 

These many questions converged. It became clear that there was an opportunity to create a shared framework that could support both sides of the equation: helping publishers develop stronger curriculum, while helping districts make more informed adoption decisions. That inspired the Knowledge Matters .

We had past experience to draw on: In 2023, we created a review framework for evidence-based, knowledge-building ELA in . We built on that foundation while bringing together additional experts with deep experience in high school English, to ensure the criteria reflected the unique demands of academic expectations and classroom instruction in grades 9-12. 

That yielded a set of about two dozen criteria across eight domains, starting with a curriculum’s alignment to the science of reading. A strong curriculum uses evidence-based practices that accelerate student literacy, such as building vocabulary and knowledge through reading a substantial and coherent volume of texts. That helps students grapple with challenging texts, including through communal close reads that build students’ stamina, confidence and ability to ensure that what they read makes sense. It also engages students with content-rich topics drawn from history, science, the arts and literature, because a rich knowledge base is what makes complex texts comprehensible and literary analysis meaningful. 

Our tool identifies the features of a curriculum that foster this growth, including activities that systematically develop academic and domain-specific vocabulary; guidance for educators to engage students in productive and sustained academic discussions; explicit instruction in writing and frequent writing opportunities anchored in texts; targeted supports to grant equitable access to grade-level content; and predictable, effective instructional routines and teacher-facing materials to inform professional learning.

We then field-tested the tool by reviewing Novel HS ELA, a knowledge-rich, novel-based 9-12 program published by , The curriculum was designed to foster engagement with rich literature while also developing the knowledge, analytical skills and reading experiences that prepare teenagers for success in college, careers and civic life. Working through the review process helped us refine the tool while providing meaningful feedback to support the development of the materials. It also provided insights into how hard many publishers are working to put strong curriculum into the hands of great teachers. 

Ultimately, our goal is pretty simple: help more educators gain access to the strongest possible instructional materials. We believe that better curriculum sets the foundation for strong teaching, and that clearer guidance helps both curriculum developers and school systems move the field forward. 

When educators have a common language of excellence, both teaching and learning thrive. Our hope is that this tool supports high school educators to develop a shared understanding of what high-quality literacy instruction looks like and where instructional time is best spent. The tool isn’t just a way to evaluate materials — it’s an opportunity to identify and inspire the rigorous, engaging, effective English curriculum and instruction that all high school students deserve.

]]>
Opinion: Lessons from Charters Where Every Student Graduates, Most of Them With a Plan /article/lessons-from-charters-where-every-student-graduates-most-of-them-with-a-plan/ Tue, 23 Jun 2026 18:30:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1034290 At the Charter School Growth Fund, graduation is our favorite time of year. It is when schools shine. We are reminded of what is possible when students, teachers and school leaders have excellence as their north star.

Charters are built on the premise that all kids can learn when a culture of high expectations, great teaching and deep relationships with students and families works together to help each child in the school learn and grow.

This year alone, over 30,000 high school seniors in hundreds of high schools across the country that our fund invests in earned over a billion dollars in college scholarships. And close to 100% of them have been accepted and are going to college.

For individual students, this is an extraordinary outcome.“For my family, this scholarship means that all of their support and sacrifice over the years has truly paid off,” said Laythan Davis, who is graduating from Uncommon Schools in Rochester, New York, this year, and headed to Cornell University on a QuestBridge Scholarship.

But it is surprisingly ordinary in a subset of public schools that have created an approach that works year after year. Our hope is that this becomes ordinary in all communities across the country. 

I had a chance to ask four great leaders of these extraordinary charter school networks about their “secret sauce,” and this is what I learned:

At Friendship Public Charter School in the heart of Southeast Washington, D.C., CEO Pat Brantley and her veteran team of educators are not only graduating 100% of their senior class, but also helping students earn more than and acceptance to four-year colleges and universities across the country. Friendship leaders credit their success to creating a school environment where students are exposed early to college coursework, career pathways, internships and real-world experiences that help them see new possibilities for their future. 

From NASA partnerships and architecture mentoring programs to dual-enrollment classes and study abroad opportunities, Friendship students are encouraged to see themselves not only as college students, but as future leaders, engineers, designers and innovators. For many, those pathways are already paying off: Students are leveraging their career training to earn real income while in college, taking on work in their chosen fields that goes well beyond what a fast food job or work-study position might offer. Educators at Friendship often describe the school community as a “village,” one where students are deeply known, challenged and supported long before graduation day. 

Across the country, public charter schools like Friendship are helping students achieve outcomes that often go unnoticed and therefore uninterrogated. We should be looking to these schools for strategies that work, not only in the charter sector but in public schools across the country with similar needs and student populations. 

For example, at DSST Public Schools in Colorado, seniors have earned more than $48 million in scholarships this year alone, while maintaining a 100% postsecondary placement rate for every graduating class since 2008. Each student averaged more than six college acceptances while earning highly competitive national scholarships, such as QuestBridge, Daniels Fund and Posse Foundation scholarships. This success comes from a that begins long before senior year. Students receive individualized advising, support in navigating financial aid and scholarships and access to counselors and educators who help students see college and career success as attainable and expected.

In Chicago, Noble Schools, which serves roughly 10% of Chicago’s public school population, consistently account for over $500 million in scholarships, more than 30% of the district’s annual scholarship dollars. More than two-thirds of Noble seniors are first-generation college students, and the network has built a college-going culture where students are surrounded by counselors, mentors and alumni who help make higher education feel attainable rather than out of reach. More than 1,000 Noble seniors enroll in college each year, many the first in their family to navigate the process. Noble to rigorous academics, mentorship and a strong college persistence model that helps students succeed after high school graduation. 

At Uncommon Schools — a charter network operating in five Northeastern communities — graduating seniors earned more than $29 million in scholarships, while 95% of students were accepted to four-year colleges, continuing a long-standing culture of academic excellence and college persistence for first-generation students. Overall, Uncommon students graduate from college at nearly four times the national rate of their peers. Leaders to long-term alumni support systems that help first-generation students navigate the challenges of college enrollment, persistence, and completion. 

Students like Laythan represent what becomes possible when schools combine high expectations with real support. During high school, Laythan helped build an AI-powered litter detection program, volunteered in his community and launched an eco-friendly clothing business — all while preparing for college as the first student from his school to attend Cornell.

Through dedicated coaching and continued engagement after graduation, Uncommon works to ensure students not only get into college but also earn their degrees.

These stories aren’t just about scholarships and college acceptance letters; they are a call to action. These schools prove every day that excellence is possible and that potential isn’t in short supply: opportunity is.

]]>
Undocumented Kansas High School Graduates Find Themselves Increasingly Targeted /article/undocumented-kansas-high-school-graduates-find-themselves-increasingly-targeted/ Wed, 17 Jun 2026 16:30:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1034032 This article was originally published in

For 22 years, Kansas leaders protected a law allowing some undocumented students to pay in-state tuition to attend the state’s public colleges, universities and technical schools.

Those days are over.

During the recently ended session, the GOP-dominated state legislature passed overturning the policy that has allowed thousands of young Kansans to pay for and earn a college education. Only the veto of Gov. Laura Kelly, a Democrat, saved the law from repeal.

National challenges are also looming.

The has begun systematically suing the more than 20 states that have such laws. The Department of Justice argues in-state tuition laws incentivize unauthorized immigration and favor immigrants over U.S. citizens.

On June 3, , which is similar to the one in Kansas. Nebraska’s Republican governor had agreed to a consent decree to end the law after being sued.

Kansas Attorney General warns that Kansas could be next.

“If Kansas were to be sued by the federal government over this statute, Kansas would likely lose the lawsuit,” Kobach said in given to state legislators.

Other GOP legislators are pressing the same message.

Sen. Mike Thompson, a Johnson County Republican, led efforts in the last legislative session to reframe in-state tuition as a public benefit, arguing the Kansas law is out of sync with federal law, a view that Kobach also holds.

“The DOJ is watching Kansas closely and if we allow this to continue, we will be sued, and we will lose,” Thompson said in a social media post.

Targeting Dreamers

Since 2004, thousands of immigrant Kansas high school graduates, often called Dreamers, have used the law to earn degrees by paying in-state fees instead of far higher international student rates.

Republican legislators have targeted the law each session, trying to overturn it.

Supporters have long pushed back, including the Kansas Board of Regents, the Kansas Association of School Boards and immigrant rights advocates.

Rep. Louis Ruiz, a Kansas City, Kansas, Democrat who is retiring at the end of this term, fears what the future holds for the state’s undocumented K-12 students.

Ruiz has long supported the students, knowing that many were brought to the U.S. as young children by their parents. They view Kansas as home.

“Some people, especially some Republicans, try to claim that these students are getting a free tuition,” Ruiz said. “No, that’s not accurate. They are paying a rate as residents of the state.”

Qualifications include graduating from an accredited Kansas high school after attending for at least three years.

A dozen people standing in the Kansas Statehouse rotunda.
Advocates have repeatedly traveled to Topeka in support of in-state tuition for undocumented students. (Instagram post/Kansas Latino Community Network)

An Obama-era program has also aided undocumented immigrant students. But it also is under heightened .

offers temporary protection against deportation for those who qualify and undergo vetting, including biometrics.

DACA recipients can get a work permit and often begin putting their degrees to work in chosen professions.

New applications to the program are on hold while federal court challenges play out.

DACA approval must be renewed every two years.

by the administration are causing people to lose their status. And some have been deported.

The Trump administration says extra vetting is behind the lengthened wait times.

“I was terrified that it wouldn’t be a quick renewal,” said one Kansas City area DACA recipient of her renewal, which was granted in August 2025.

Still, her concerns linger. She requested to remain anonymous. Similar to several people interviewed for this story, she is protective of extended family and other immigrants in her social circles.

“Even if you’re a permanent resident, you’re not safe,” she said. “They’re looking for anything to detain you and deport you without giving you your day in court.”

There were 505,940 active DACA recipients in the nation as of Sept. 30, 2025, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

Kansas had 4,230 DACA recipients at that time. Missouri, which does not allow in-state tuition rates for undocumented students, had 2,490 DACA recipients.

Also, a Board of Immigration Appeals decision in late April found that holding an active DACA status is not sufficient alone to protect against deportation. The decision conflicts with rulings in federal courts that have upheld the program’s constitutionality.

The is trying to calm DACA recipients’ fears, releasing detailed information about the ruling. The center emphasizes that DACA still offers protections from deportation. But the situation can become more complicated if a person is detained by immigration officials.

“I feel like every day I wake up and it’s something else, something new,” said Maria, a former DACA recipient and a graduate of Olathe East High School.

Last year, Maria completed the process to become a legal permanent resident through marriage to her U.S.-born husband.

Maria grew up in Olathe, with no memories of her native Puebla, Mexico.

She immigrated at 2 years old with her mother, reuniting with her father who had migrated earlier.

Maria fully understood her legal situation as a 16-year-old.

She wanted to study abroad, along with some of her classmates. Her mother explained that it would be impossible for Maria to leave the country and safely return, because of her lack of legal status then.

The Kansas in-state law made college financially feasible. She earned an associate degree at Johnson County Community College, then a bachelor’s degree in business administration and a minor in psychology from the University of Kansas.

Undocumented Kansas students, even with the in-state tuition law, cannot receive public federal or state grants and scholarships or subsidized student loans.

“Had it been out-of-state tuition, even for Johnson County Community College, I would not have been able to graduate at all,” Maria said.

A mother’s plan to protect her U.S.-born children

Karina Valtierra prepared her four sons for the possibility that she could be deported.

Valtierra’s DACA status lapsed for eight tense weeks this spring.

A native of Durango, Mexico, she’s lived in the U.S. since the age of 11 and applied for her DACA renewal early. But it didn’t arrive by her February expiration date.

As a result, she couldn’t legally drive, or work, and had to step away from her job teaching young children at a school in Wichita.

She gave an aunt power of attorney. She arranged for house payments to be covered for the family home. She spoke to her oldest child, a 17-year-old, about assuming the role as head of the household.

The youngest, at 13, struggled to understand.

“Just having to have that conversation with them was awful,” Valtierra said. “And trying to explain, ‘I’m protecting you guys, making sure you’ll be OK if anything happens.’ ”

Valtierra’s renewal was approved in late March.

She’s resumed teaching, putting the early childhood/leadership degree she earned from Fort Hays State University into practice.

DACA was never intended to be a permanent fix. It was a stopgap for a generation of immigrants who had been brought to the U.S. without documentation as children.

Obama instituted it by executive order in 2012.

Congress, despite periods of strong bipartisan support, never passed the DREAM Act, which would offer a route to permanent legal status for some undocumented students.

DREAM stands for Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act. The act was first introduced in 2001.

Most of the original DACA recipients, and many former students known as Dreamers, are now in their 30s or older.

“We consider this our country, even though we don’t have a piece of paper that says this is our country,” Valtierra said. “Now we have kids, and we’ve built a life in here.”

‘In their crosshairs’

Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach has been a leading critic of in-state tuition laws and DACA. He has either filed or joined lawsuits against both, in Kansas and through national networks.

“Congress declared that no state may give in-state tuition benefits to illegal aliens unless the state extends the same tuition benefits to out-of-state U.S. citizens,” submitted during the last legislative session.

More than two decades ago, the law’s authors took care to , ensuring that undocumented students had a higher burden to meet than native-born people, who can often establish residency for the purposes of tuition, in a year.

Early predictions of thousands of Kansas immigrant students enrolling using the in-state law each semester never materialized.

Enrollment peaked at 670 undocumented students statewide at institutions in 2015 and then again in 2017. The low was 169 students in 2006, according to state enrollment data.

The enrollments have been steadily declining for nearly a decade, with 310 in 2024.

Advocates worry that students aren’t being told by some colleges or academic advisers that the law still exists. Also, young people might be discouraged, given highly publicized crackdowns on undocumented immigrants by the current administration.

So far, the Justice Department has settled lawsuits with Nebraska, Texas, Kentucky and Oklahoma, ending in-state tuition programs in those states.

Lawsuits are pending in Democrat-led states of Illinois, Minnesota, Virginia and California.

If Kansas is sued, the legal action could reignite conflicts between Kobach, a Republican, and Kelly, a Democrat, or possibly her successor.

As attorney general, Kobach would need to defend the state’s law. Kobach is seeking reelection. Kelly is barred from doing so by term limits.

The two have wrangled in court recently over their respective legal lanes.

, alleging that he was failing to defend the state against the overreaches of the Trump administration.

In March, the Kansas Supreme Court issued a narrow decision that dismissed Kelly’s petition. Both sides claimed victory.

Kelly said that if Kobach continued to “refuse to stand up for the state, Kansans can be assured that I will,” according to

Advocates for immigrant students are preparing for the possible court challenge and other headwinds.

“The environment has definitely changed around the issue,” said Alejandro Rangel-Lopez, campaign manager for New Frontiers, Loud Light’s project in southwest Kansas. “But I do believe we still have a really good law in place.”

Rangel-Lopez, of Dodge City, helped organize some of the pushback during debates on , the bill that sought to end in-state tuition.

Planning continues, including gaining insights from states that have already been sued. And national organizations such as the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, also known as , have also been contacted.

“We know the fight isn’t over yet because of the national environment and that we’re probably in their crosshairs,” Rangel-Lopez said.

This first appeared on and is republished here under a .

]]>
A Year Ago, Experts Worried About NAEP’s Future. Now, the Test is Expanding /article/a-year-ago-experts-worried-about-naeps-future-now-the-test-is-expanding/ Fri, 15 May 2026 16:41:44 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1032482 A year ago, there was speculation that the Nation’s Report Card was at risk under the Trump administration. 

Testing experts at the Education Department had been laid off and the board in charge of the program . But now, expansion is coming in the form of additional results that could give the public more information about how students in their states are performing.

The National Assessment Governing Board approved a new testing schedule Friday that allows for state-level results in 12th grade math and reading, eighth and 12th grade civics and eighth grade science. 

The vote was 16 to 3.


Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ Newsletter


NAGB, which sets policy for the National Assessment of Educational Progress, has long aspired to add more granular results, said Executive Director Lesley Muldoon.

“That’s what helps drive actual policy action at the state level,” she said. 

The would take effect in 2028 for eighth grade civics and 12th grade math and reading. The eighth grade science test would be administered in 2029 and 12th graders would take a civics exam in 2032. Participation is optional, but NAGB wants to know states’ intentions by this summer.

The governing board isn’t alone in wanting NAEP to be more useful to state policymakers. In its on the future of the American workforce, the Bipartisan Policy Center, led by former Education Secretary Margaret Spellings, called for more state-level data in the same three areas and a shorter, six-month timeline between the assessment and the release of the results.

Some observers say the board’s vote underscores the importance of NAEP.

“This suggests an acknowledgment that standardized testing, and comparable data across states, still matters,” said Dale Chu, an education consultant who frequently writes about assessment. 

At the same time, in its fiscal year 2027 budget, the administration is requesting less for the program than Congress has appropriated in recent years, $137 million compared with $193 million.

Muldoon told ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ that if Congress maintains $193 million for the program, no additional money would be needed to expand testing at the state level. But if all 50 states want to participate, they might need more resources. 

‘We got busy’

The response from states, she said, has been positive, but she doesn’t expect all to sign up. 

Board Member Julia Rafal-Baer, who voted against the plan, said while she agreed with the science and civics schedule, she’s concerned about whether enough states would participate in the 12th grade assessments. The announcement, she said, would also come in the midst of a “charged environment.” 

“You can see it bubbling up now — public trust around testing, technology, AI, screens and student data,” she said during the meeting. “In this room, we understand all the differences. Parents right now do not understand the differences.”  

Others noted that with 39 governors’ races this year, those who show interest now might be out of office by the time they have to formally commit. But Board Member Ron Reynolds, formerly head of a California private school organization, said the elections shouldn’t affect the board’s decision.

“I think we would cross a dangerous line if we began to anticipate what the political environment might be at a specific time and then make decisions in advance that might foreclose an opportunity to assess and report,” he said.

States would need to identify a sample ranging from 1,200 to 2,000 students in each of the categories for which they want new results. 

Tennessee Rep. Mark White, a Republican and current NAGB chair, told ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ that his state is among those that would likely “jump on the opportunity” to see how the state’s students are performing in science, civics and in their senior year.

“Tennessee realized that our K-12 standards were not adequate in 2011 when we compared our performance to NAEP data,” he said. “We got busy.”

In 2013, the state was the in the nation, and this week as a top performer in post-pandemic academic recovery.

Angélica Infante Green, Rhode Island’s education commissioner, wants her state to participate in all of the assessments, but is particularly enthusiastic about state-level civics . The state passed in 2021 requiring students to demonstrate proficiency in civics to graduate.

“It’s important, based on where we are as a country,” she said. “If our students don’t know how the government works and how our democracy works, that poses a challenge.”

Chu said he wouldn’t be surprised if Mike Morath, state chief in Texas, or Indiana Education Secretary Katie Jenner also take “a keen interest,” but predicted that “in many other places the reaction would amount to little more than a shrug.”

Former Florida Commissioner Manny Diaz Jr. after the 2024 fourth and eighth grade results were released. The state saw a sharp decline in reading scores, which he attributed to a sample of schools that he said was not representative of the state overall and included two of the lowest-performing schools. He also blamed the shift that year on the switch to a digital test on school district devices. 

The Florida Department of Education did not respond to questions about whether the state might participate. 

‘Powerful source of information’

Chu and others, however, question whether state-level data on 12th graders would be that useful. 

“Low student motivation has long been a cloud hanging over 12th grade,” he said. “I’m not sure bringing those results to the state level adds much unless that issue is addressed.”

Muldoon disagreed that motivation is a challenge, but said that getting a large enough national sample of 12th graders can be. Seniors, she said, are sometimes off campus for internships or college trips. 

Some states, like Nevada, require students to take the ACT for graduation. But Jhone Ebert, superintendent of the Clark County School District, and former state chief, said a college entrance exam might not be the best way to measure the skills of students planning to go straight into the workforce. NAEP, she said, would offer a fuller view of students’ skills.

“Not everybody’s going to college,” said Ebert, also on the board. “That doesn’t mean that they’re not going to be successful participants in our society.”

National results from 2024’s 12th graders were discouraging. Twenty-two percent tested at the proficient level in math, a 2 percentage point decline since 2019. In reading, 35% were proficient, also a drop. As with fourth and eighth graders in recent years, the percentage of high school seniors scoring at the below basic level increased. But those results don’t tell states anything about their specific strengths and weaknesses. 

State-level data could be a “really powerful source of information,” Muldoon said. “There is no other nationally representative assessment of high school students’ achievement.” 

‘Blue and red states’

The same is true for civics. The last NAEP civics test was in 2022, and just in eighth grade. Average scores on the 300-point scale fell by two points, the first-ever decline in the 25-year history of the test, which measures students’ knowledge of government, the founding documents and politics. 

Twelfth grade results in civics haven’t been available since 2010. The 2032 civics test in 12th grade will also be an updated version. Patrick Kelly, chair of NAGB’s assessment development committee, told the members Friday that while the “bones are good,” the design of the civics assessment is old.

The last time the test was updated, “our president of the United States was playing ,” he said. 

Shawn Healy, chief policy and advocacy officer at iCivics, a nonprofit that provides civics lesson plans and online games, called the state-level results and the update “a big win for our field.”

The results, he said, will offer insight into the success of civics education policies at the state level, such as requiring a dedicated course or completion of student projects, or offering diplomas that recognize achievements. This year, he’s tracked 240 civics education bills in 40 states.

“That speaks to the interest in this issue across blue and red states,” he said.

In science, 2029 won’t be the first time state results will be available. Most states voluntarily . But now, under a new design, the questions will more closely match what states expect eighth graders to know in science, said Christine Cunningham, senior vice president of STEM learning at the Museum of Science in Boston and a NAGB member. Large school systems,  those in the Trial Urban District Assessment group, would also be able to opt in to that science exam. Currently, only national data is available for those subjects and grades.

“At a time when science and engineering are having such a profound impact on our lives, it’s important to understand how our students are doing,” she said. “Education leaders continue to see value in expanding opportunities for state-level reporting beyond reading and math.” 

]]>
Opinion: High School Yearbooks Focus on the Fun Had, Obscuring the Pain People Also Experienced /article/high-school-yearbooks-focus-on-the-fun-had-obscuring-the-pain-people-also-experienced/ Sun, 26 Apr 2026 16:30:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1031533 This article was originally published in

High school students will soon take part in a more than in American education: receiving yearbooks at the end of the school year.

In an era of high-speed ephemeral images and social media, some may see high school yearbooks as outdated. But high school and college students have told me that they found it meaningful to look through their yearbooks and inscribe their classmates’ books with personal messages, poems, jokes or simply their signatures.

Many graduates will tuck away their yearbooks – some to be lost forever, but others to be revisited or rediscovered years or decades later.

, as time capsules and as a way to understand how youth culture, sports, gender and race relations have changed, or have not changed, over time. Despite their ubiquity, school yearbooks are a largely untapped .

But , people may probe an old high school yearbook to learn more about a mass murderer or to scrutinize whether someone is fit for public office. Some reporters, for example, dug into Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s while he was going through the confirmation process in 2018. His yearbook included a reference to a female student that some boys, including a young Kavanaugh, might have dated or had a sexual relationship with.

But as Eichhorn notes, some scholars seem to dismiss yearbooks as “cringy” documents created by teenagers, or as documents focused on personal nostalgia, unworthy of examination.

The Salinas High School yearbook staff of 1938 is seen working to produce their final product for the school year. (Michael A. Messner/CC BY)

An incomplete picture

Yearbooks are a limited source for accurately understanding history.

In my 2025 study of from Salinas High School in California, where I graduated from in 1970, I found nary a mention of the or the Salinas Valley’s violent , which Salinas High alum .

Nor did the Salinas High School yearbooks mention the war in Vietnam, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, or the mass social movements that opposed them.

Some yearbooks from the 2000s showed student clubs that addressed violence, substance abuse and LGBTQ+ issues. But over the years, yearbooks have mostly skipped the pain of high school and focused instead on the pleasure.

They shine a spotlight on sports, cheering and public rituals like all-school rallies and homecoming week. Photos and text blurbs celebrate the accomplishments and humorous antics of the “popular” kids and, at times, the most academically successful students.

A nostalgic rear window

It can be reassuring to dive into nostalgic remembering. It’s common for most people to idealize the past and remember it as better than today.

from 1939 found that 62% of Americans agreed that people were happier and more content a generation earlier. Since then, that most people think fondly about the good old days, and usually think 30 or 40 years ago was a better time than the one they are living today.

We can see this penchant for nostalgia in the Salinas High yearbooks of the late 1970s and 1980s. Students in these yearbooks are seen enjoying 1950s-themed dances echoing popular television shows like “” that idealized 50s culture.

In analyzing high school yearbooks of the past, I tried to not sidestep nostalgia – probably impossible to do anyway – but to consciously deploy an idea called critical nostalgia. This means acknowledging the pleasures of looking back in time, while remaining attentive to the ways that schools too often worsen, rather than challenge, .

A double focus

Taking on a critical nostalgia lens requires a double focus – first, looking at what high school yearbooks routinely illuminate, like football rallies and cheerleaders. It also means identifying what American writer and activist ,” like the voices, imagery and activities of marginalized students who have been left outside the frame.

Two examples from the Salinas High School yearbooks illustrate this approach.

Someone looking at Salinas editions from the early 1900s might be surprised to see girls baseball, track and field, volleyball and basketball teams engaged in interscholastic competition.

Yearbook photos show girls wearing school sports uniforms and being treated with respect.

By the early 1930s, girls sports teams disappeared from the yearbooks, absorbed into the Girls’ Athletic Association, a recently formed organization that was based on the idea that competition and vigorous exercise was unhealthy for girls.

For nearly half a century after the creation of the Girls’ Athletic Association, photos of girls playing sports were accompanied by captions that disparaged their athletic abilities.

In the mid-1970s, when competitive girls sports teams were reinstated at Salinas, the yearbooks started to give them more equitable and respectful treatment.

This history shows an uneven picture of social change, as changes in girls sports were driven by the waxing and waning of .

The Japanese Students’ Club at Salinas High School is seen in the 1941 yearbook. (Michael A. Messner/CC BY)

The spring 1941 and 1942 Salinas High School yearbooks, meanwhile, showed scores of Japanese American students – about 14% of the student body at the time – fully integrated into nearly all aspects of student life.

But by the time the yearbook was distributed in the spring of 1942, had been sent with their families to the Salinas Rodeo Grounds, where they were temporarily housed in converted horse stalls.

They were later transferred for the duration of World War II to an internment camp in Poston, Arizona.

The 1943 yearbook showed zero Japanese American students, nor did the editors of the book mention how or why their classmates had disappeared from campus.

For today’s Salinas students, reading their school’s old yearbooks against the backdrop of this history can help them to explore questions about how in their community and country today.

A starting point for understanding history

It’s not just Salinas High students who might benefit from reading their school’s past yearbooks. I have spoken with a handful of professors who are guiding their students into their university’s archive of yearbooks to explore race and gender relations in their own community.

Students discover that the size, content and organization of school yearbooks have shifted over time. But the books are a rich starting point for a group exploration of how schools create a pleasurable collective identity – for some, at least – while simultaneously shaping and celebrating students’ division and inequalities.The Conversation

This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .

]]>
LAUSD Career Tech Programs Offer Head Start for High School Students /article/lausd-career-tech-programs-offer-head-start-for-high-school-students/ Mon, 13 Apr 2026 16:30:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1030986 This article was originally published in

Sergio Garcia is quick to the scene. He puts on a scuffed firefighter jacket, grabs an oxygen mask and crouches down on hot concrete to start chest compressions on a dummy body. 

At the Los Angeles Unified School District’s career technical education showcase, under an outdoor canopy in blistering Southern California heat, the fire academy student demonstrates CPR to other students who might also be interested in joining. 

Sergio represents one of 23 high schools and six middle schools that showcased a range of career technical education at L.A. Unified, including 15 comprehensive three- or four-year programs that prepare students for industries through real-world experience. The showcase, held last month at the , a private health equity foundation, featured student projects, live demonstrations and skill-based challenges, is part of the district’s “Dream It, Achieve It!” initiative that pairs students with local industry leaders.

“With my degree, I’d rather know I’m going to help people,” said Sergio, a senior and fourth-year deputy chief at the fire academy at Banning High School who is on track to earn a fire science degree at a technical college. “Although it is very physically demanding, the fact that you’re doing good in this world is a bigger gift than anyone could ever ask for.”

Building technical and team-building skills 

At another canopy at the showcase, students cheered a remote-controlled battle of two robots, vying for the prize of a 3D-printed bot, while Madelynne Arevalo helped set up a mini flight simulator. Madelynne, a senior at Fremont High School in Los Angeles, is in the robotics program and is designing a rocket launch for her aerospace engineering project.

“We also compete with other high schools, and the competitions are really fun,” Madelynne said. “I’m really proud of all the models (we made), even if they’re not the final ones we end up using.”

Madelynne remembers designing an elevator system in a robot she worked on for a competition. Although she and her team chose a more time-efficient robot for the event, she said she learned how to develop new technical and team-building skills in a high-stakes environment. 

“It was a lot of our own ideas and a lot of collaboration,” Madelynne said, “and I thought that even if it doesn’t work, at least the process was nice.”

In recent years, L.A. Unified has significantly expanded career technical education to about 435 pathways, from engineering and technology to business and construction, serving nearly 40,000 students. About 1,000 students completed internships in the 2024-2025 school year, and CTE programs have about a 97% graduation rate. 

“CTE careers are the fastest growing careers in the United States, more than students going to a four-year university,” said Jaime Medina, a firefighter and teacher in L.A. Unified’s firefighting program. 

Israel Urbina, a junior at Washington Preparatory High School in Los Angeles, is a third-year student in the photojournalism program. At the showcase, he displayed a photo in which he manipulated light to create different designs, objects and shapes, including one that spelled out his name. 

“Right now, my thing in photography is light painting,” Israel said. “I did a video about it in my photography class, and it’s about all my light paintings and the different ones I’ve done and the different people I’ve done it with.”

Ken Kerbs, a photojournalism teacher at the school, described Israel as nearly an “expert” on light painting. Through years of honing techniques related to perspective, reflections, texture, light and shadow, Kerbs said most of his students leave the program with greater curiosity about the world and a sharper eye for detail. 

“What that says to me is that teaching them the basics is to be sensitive and have a different sensibility about their environment,” Kerbs said. “That’s what makes me come to school in the morning.”

Blessed Thomas-Hill, a senior at Washington Prep, worked with Israel on a film about light painting and wrote poetry for the film’s narrative. She said she chose the photojournalism program because of Kerbs, who helped teach her to be more comfortable expressing herself.  

“I’m an introvert, and talking with people, I really struggle with that a lot,” Blessed said. “I got to know a lot of great friends this year. I’ve got to get closer to more people. It’s made me more sociable.” 

Israel Urbina, a junior at Washington Preparatory High School, features his photos. (Vani Sanganeria/EdSource)

Students ‘rise to the occasion’ 

Blessed said she wants to be an artist and plans to incorporate photography in her personal art. She remembers a field trip to Cal State Northridge, where she learned about a photographer’s protest of immigration raids through his photos of L.A. communities, which inspired her to commit to art. 

“It’s really inspiring in a way because it shows that you’re not just alone in your community,” Blessed said. 

Madelynne said she plans to continue studying robotics and will pursue a college degree in biomedical engineering. Because she had not committed to robotics until her senior year, she felt she was behind many students who had started coding in middle school. 

“At first, I didn’t believe in myself. I didn’t think I was smart enough to do something as complicated as engineering,” Madelynne said, adding that the robotics program led her to Girls Build, a club where girls learn to code and build machines together. 

“Spreading the positivity around has helped me believe more in myself,” she said. 

Sergio, the Banning High fire academy student, said he initially struggled with how physically demanding his training was, but that he learned to build speed and strength with each simulated fire alarm drill. 

“I’ve also learned that when it comes to rising to an occasion, I rise to that occasion. Whether it be someone’s in trouble, I help protect people,”  he said. “This academy has brought out leadership in me, the discipline, the social skills that I wouldn’t have learned any other way.” 

Sergio said he also plans to become certified as a diesel mechanic, because the firefighting program has allowed him to combine two of his interests.  

“I love the whole firefighting part, but I’ve also always loved working on cars. I figured if I’m going to be a mechanic, I might as well do it for a better cause,” Sergio said. “Working on fire engines, so when those firefighters go out and save those lives, I can say I helped with that.”

This story was originally published on EdSource.

]]>
Financial Literacy Courses are Expanding in Connecticut, Thanks to New Requirement /article/financial-literacy-courses-are-expanding-in-connecticut-thanks-to-new-requirement/ Thu, 09 Apr 2026 18:30:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1030872 This article was originally published in

When Stamford High School students arrive at their personal finance class, they’re greeted by a stock ticker and a TV monitor showing the day’s business and financial news.

Printed below, on the yellow wall, is a collage of words like “independence,” “generational wealth” and “dream big.” “Your journey to financial freedom starts here,” another wall reads.

This is the school’s recently renovated financial literacy lab. As schools across Connecticut work to meet a new graduation requirement, Stamford — with help from the city’s well-established finance sector — is staying a few steps ahead.

The district already offered personal finance as an elective before the statewide requirement went into effect. Now, it’s upping its game, in part with the help of a $150,000 grant from Stamford-based financial services company Synchrony.

It’s part of $3 million in grants Synchrony has rolled out nationwide under its “Empowering Financial Futures” initiative over the last two years. And it comes as interest in K-12 financial literacy grows around the U.S. 

“Kids need to start to get focused on this, and they need to understand what true financial literacy is,” Sue Bishop, Synchrony’s chief corporate affairs officer, said at the lab’s grand opening last month. 

The company’s grant to Stamford’s public schools went toward purchasing a live stock ticker and two TV monitors, along with dozens of finance-related games, books and activities. The materials will support a now-mandatory personal finance class, which includes topics ranging from household budgeting to investment and loan planning. 

Connecticut Financial Scholars, part of a national organization seeking to bring financial literacy into K-12 education, helped Stamford design the course. Director of Program Support Elisa Oliver said it’s exciting to witness students picking up new skills.

“Seeing kids actually break down a loan amortization calculator,” Oliver marveled. “We’re seeing students having these conversations when they’re 15, 16 years old, which is awesome.”

Toward increasing economic mobility

Connecticut’s financial literacy requirement , with the state legislature voting overwhelmingly in favor. The mandate also received support from Gov. Ned Lamont and state Treasurer Erick Russell. 

“Personal financial management is one of the most important instructional tools that we can give young people to achieve economic independence and stability throughout their lives,” Lamont when the bill was signed into law. “Requiring it to graduate from high school is simply common sense.”

Under the requirement, starting in the fall of 2023, public high school students in the state had to take a half-credit personal finance course to graduate, starting with the class of 2027. The state is using curriculum developed by , a national organization that has developed the most-used personal finance curriculum in the country. 

In an interview with the Connecticut Mirror, Russell said the financial literacy requirement fits into broader wealth-building and financial security efforts supported by the state. He pointed to programs like , and the — the state’s 529 college savings program — as additional examples.

“Having that strong educational foundation and understanding of finances is also key,  so that people can take advantage of some of those opportunities,” he said. “We want to make sure, as we look at this investment from Synchrony and others like it, as we look at the financial education course requirement, that we’re setting people up for long term success in our state.”

In requiring personal finance coursework, Connecticut joined a growing national trend. According to , 39 states currently require students to take a personal finance course before high school graduation.

“As more states adopt these requirements, ensuring educators have the training, tools, and ongoing support to teach personal finance effectively is becoming increasingly important,” Steve Bumbaugh, the council’s CEO, said in a on Monday.

That sentiment is echoed by Connecticut Financial Scholars. In the years since the organization set up shop in the state, it has worked to promote financial literacy education, with a focus on Connecticut’s large cities and higher-need school districts.

The goal is to promote equity in access to financial knowledge in the state, said organization executive director Betsy McNeil.

“Without adequate financial education, students are more likely to struggle with debt or financial stress that really can impact them on a daily basis and can limit their economic mobility,” she said. “We’re looking to equip the students with the really essential financial skills, knowledge, awareness and confidence.”

Bishop, of Synchrony, said the need to teach financial literacy has grown as more and more young people, especially college students, get wrapped up in the world of sports gambling and prediction markets.

“You can get that same high by investing in the stock market or saving in a mutual fund — in a much safer and much more beneficial way,” Bishop said.

Sue Bishop, Executive Vice President and Chief Corporate Affairs Officer at the financial services company Synchrony, speaks at Stamford High School’s new financial literacy lab on Mar. 23, 2026. A Synchrony grant helped fund the monitor and stock ticker behind her.

Connecticut Financial Scholars is active in a number of schools, using a four-part strategy of curriculum, teacher support, parent engagement and community involvement to further spread its message. 

After the Connecticut personal finance requirement was established, the organization on how to implement financial education curricula in their classrooms.

Efforts like the Stamford High School lab also help, McNeil said, by providing ways for community members and local institutions to support student learning. In the coming months she said she hopes more communities will benefit from this kind of investment.

“We continue to explore and listen for those opportunities in the other communities that we’re in as well,” she said, noting that Stamford is one of the state’s “alliance districts,” a group of under-resourced school districts in Connecticut. 

“This is needed in Stamford, and we recognize and understand it is needed in other communities across the state as well,” McNeil added.

Stamford ahead of the curve

Synchrony’s Bishop said she’s glad the personal finance course also devotes time to more mundane topics, such as building a good credit score. “You honestly cannot live in this country without credit,” she said.

When she graduated high school, Bishop said the extent of her financial literacy was knowing how to balance a checkbook. That didn’t change until her first job, which happened to be at a mutual fund company.

“I was like, ‘I’m not good at math. I’m a communications person. What am I doing?’” Bishop said. “I still say it was the best thing that ever happened to me, because I learned about investing.”

Courses like Stamford’s aim to put that kind of knowledge in the classroom where, in theory, every student will be exposed to it. Bishop said that also has an upside for banks themselves.

“We never want to loan money to someone who can’t pay us back,” she said. “We have a vested interest in developing young people to be responsible adults.”

Stamford High School personal finance teacher Doug Taylor said for the final assessment of the class, students face a “life scenario” in which they manage a household budget while handling unexpected problems like a car breaking down.

“In the end of that cycle, they must have had the budget balanced,” Taylor said.

Stamford senior Nick Sutin said he’s landed a job with a nearby finance company, and he said he gives some credit to the finance classes he’s taken. He said that expertise helped him make a strong impression.

“You already have the background to answer all these types of questions,” Sutin said.

Stamford students who want to study finance topics beyond the state requirement have plenty of opportunities. The high school boasts 12 business teachers, most of whom have business or financial work experience. Their classes include entrepreneurship, business communications and investing. Some students even build stock portfolios and take part in competitions with other high schools.

“This is not vocational. This is finance. This is investments. This is starting a business,” said Dorothea Mackey, the head of Stamford High School’s Career and Technical Education department.

Mackey, who previously worked as an analyst at Chrysler Capital, played a leading role in securing Synchrony’s support for the new financial literacy lab.

“This is just pushing this envelope a little bit forward to make sure that the business education is solidified,” she said.

This first appeared on and is republished here under a .

]]>
Opinion: When It Comes to Developing AI Rules, Who Asked the Students? /article/when-it-comes-to-developing-ai-rules-who-asked-the-students/ Fri, 03 Apr 2026 10:30:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1030620 Three years ago, schools took a side.

Within weeks of ChatGPT’s release, hard rules appeared almost overnight. AI tools were banned throughout departments. Teachers watched what seemed like an existential threat materialize in real time, and they responded the way institutions usually do under pressure: They drew a line and told everyone not to cross it.

Three years later, that line is still there. And at many places, nobody ever asked whether it should be, at least not the people most affected by it.

When I looked into how my Austin, Texas, high school’s AI policy was developed, I found that my administrators made the decision internally. There was no student committee, no open forum, no campuswide survey. The rulebook was simply handed down. In K–12 education, require districts to develop and publish AI policies; when they are published, they’re often developed without proper consideration of all stakeholders, including students themselves.

It’s reasonable to counter that students are minors, that institutions need coherent governance and that not all decisions can go to a committee. But AI policy isn’t a routine curriculum adjustment. It governs what tools students are allowed to use to think, draft, research and communicate — tools that increasingly shape how knowledge is produced and evaluated outside school. Getting those rules wrong produces consequences for students.

Brittany Carr’s situation is a well-known example. In early 2023, the had three assignments flagged by an AI detector. She provided her revision history and explained her process writing deeply personal essays about her cancer diagnosis, her depression and her personal recovery. It wasn’t enough. Fearing that a second accusation could cost her financial aid, she began running every essay through an AI detector herself, rewriting any sentence it marked until her writing voice felt flattened and unfamiliar. By the end of the semester, she left the university.

Carr is not alone. The same NBC News investigation found that students across the country deliberately simplified their vocabulary and avoided complex sentence patterns — not to write better, but to write less like themselves. Creative writing assignments exist to help students find their voice, which they can’t do in fear of an algorithm. Carr’s case shows a student reshaping her writing, and ultimately her education, around a software system she had no role in approving, in a policy she had no voice in developing.

Student involvement would not necessarily have guaranteed a different outcome in Carr’s case. But it might have changed the structure that enabled it. Students could have brought up concerns about relying on automated detectors without corroborating evidence. They could have described how fear of false accusations pushes students toward simpler vocabulary, safer syntax and less intellectual risk. They could have asked what procedural protections exist before a software flag becomes an academic charge.

Instead, at many institutions, enforcement architecture was built first. Conversation came later, if at all.

It doesn’t have to work this way. In Los Altos, California, did more than sit in on policy meetings — they designed and ran community workshops, facilitated discussions between sixth graders and administrators, and built an AI chatbot to help other districts draft policies. 

A found that students overwhelmingly want to be part of decisions about how AI is used in their education — and that many already hold sophisticated views on its risks and potential. The fact that Los Altos made national news tells you how rarely that invitation is extended.

But there is a deeper reason students belong in these conversations: We know something policymakers don’t.

At my high school, I’ve witnessed — and experienced — a secret loop in the learning process: we use  large language model tools like ChatGPT and Claude to genuinely improve learning by unraveling concepts, studying for tests and brainstorming ideas. 

A few days ago, a student asked a question about a formula in my AP Physics C class — and nobody knew the answer. Another student opened his laptop and asked Claude, and after a few minutes of back-and-forth, we had completely straightened out our question, improving everyone’s understanding of how circuits worked. I used an LLM to compile notes from my Multivariable Calculus class, which helped me study and earn a near-perfect score on my test. My friend used ChatGPT to learn Java syntax for a project — not to write code, but to understand the language.

A found that 54% of U.S. teens now use AI chatbots for schoolwork, with the most common uses being research and brainstorming — not copying and pasting answers. But that message hasn’t reached the people writing the rules. This secret loop goes completely disregarded by schools, simply because it’s easier to blanket-ban the technology altogether. The generation that grew up with these tools understands their texture in a way no outside committee can replicate.

These AI policies directly affect students’ outcomes and futures. To exclude them from the conversation is simply undemocratic.

If educational institutions are serious about preparing students for democratic citizenship, that commitment must go beyond coursework and into policy-making. The time to invite students into these critical conversations is now. Will schools treat students as subjects of policy, or as participants in it?

]]>
Opinion: Why the War in Iran Is a Teachable Moment for American Education /article/why-the-war-in-iran-is-a-teachable-moment-for-american-education/ Sun, 22 Mar 2026 10:30:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1030104 Three weeks ago, Americans woke up to the prospect of war with Iran. While experts weigh the costs, risks and global consequences, the conflict also highlights major gaps — and major opportunities — in how we educate students about history here at home.

In the past few years, the world has seemed to change faster than ever. Smartphones, AI, social media and the constant flow of information have transformed daily life. Yet one thing has barely changed: the history curriculum in K–12 schools. The world may be moving fast, but history textbooks are not.

The war in Iran shows how badly educators need to change the way we teach the past. We can’t begin with distant history — the 13 colonies, ancient Egypt or classical Greece — and expect students to figure out why any of it matters. We need to begin with the world students are living in now, with the headlines they already see every day. They need to understand what’s happening in Iran before they learn it was once the Persian empire. Once they understand the present, they can begin to understand why the story of how we got here matters.

History explains our nation’s politics, our institutions, our ideas and our wars. But why should students care about how we got to the modern world if they do not understand the modern world in the first place? It is hard to make sense of the past, or even care about it, if you do not understand the present.

And yet, America still teaches history from the colonial period or classical antiquity forward. Our curricula, though not our teachers, assume students will make the connection from past to present on their own. But the worldview of a 14-year-old, fresh out of middle school and getting most of their news from TikTok, will be incomplete at best.

Schools cannot begin with history without first asking what they know about the present: Do they know where Iran is? (.) What kind of government it has? How its economy works? Why the region matters geopolitically? If we asked, we would find that many students know very little about the wider world as it exists right now. That helps explain why they so often struggle to care about its history.

Because classrooms so often teach Ivan the Terrible and Alexander the Great in a vacuum, they get lackluster results. Scores in U.S. history have declined sharply, with just 13% of middle school students performing at grade level. Yet more than 75% of high school students following current events is important to them, and 93% say more opportunities to discuss current events in the classroom.

At our school, in the Bronx, we focus on computer science, technology and internships. But our mission is larger than that: to prepare students to navigate the economy and the world. A year ago, when we looked at our graduating seniors, we found that many knew little about the world they actually live in. That is why we revamped our 9th-grade history curriculum.

Before teaching U.S. and world history, we teach students about the world as it exists today. In 9th grade, they study geography, economic systems, governments and culture in the present. That way, they can understand history as an attempt to explain the world around them, not as a random collection of facts.

We examine major powers and regions — Iran, China, the U.K., Mexico, Russia, Venezuela, Nigeria and the U.S. — and ask basic questions. How does each country’s economy work? What is its political system? How well does it serve the people who live there? What languages do people speak and what religions do they practice? How do states compete for power?

The result is that students have a framework for everything they learn later in high school.

So when federal food assistance was suspended a few months ago and students in my class were struggling to afford groceries, we turned that into a short study of federal systems and how different levels of government work. When the war in Iran began, our students already had baseline knowledge. I asked why they thought we were at war, and they talked about the strategic value of oil and the challenges of an authoritarian theocracy. They were able to think critically about what they saw on TikTok instead of simply absorbing it.

The crisis led to serious classroom conversations. Students were equipped with knowledge.

Rethinking how schools teach history takes on new urgency because social media now delivers global events to students instantly. They see what is happening in the world whether adults are ready for it or not. As educators, we have a responsibility to help them process that information with reason. We want them to think independently, not simply absorb what an algorithm feeds them.

That is especially important in an age of misinformation. It is also more engaging. When students do not see a connection between school and their own lives, absenteeism rises and disengagement follows. Starting from what is relevant to students’ lives and backgrounds is critical if we want to build students who are curious and eager to learn.

To my fellow educators, especially history teachers: I understand the hesitation. In a hyperpolarized political climate, teaching current events can be a scary and thankless task. But we have to be brave.

If our families and our students see that we are helping them make sense of what is happening in the world right now, they will remember why school matters and why our profession matters to our communities and our country. And if more people understand both the world we live in now and how it got this way, we may be able to educate a generation of leaders better prepared for the crises yet to come.

]]>
Kansas High Schoolers Could Be Required to Take U.S. Citizenship Test to Graduate /article/kansas-high-schoolers-could-be-required-to-take-u-s-citizenship-test-to-graduate/ Sat, 21 Mar 2026 16:30:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1030099 This article was originally published in

TOPEKA — In what founding document does the phrase “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness” appear? Why did the United States enter the Persian Gulf War? Why do U.S. representatives serve shorter terms than U.S. senators?

These are among the 128 questions on the U.S. citizenship test, and they could become study material for Kansas students.

Under a bill that also mandates teaching students about the dangers of communism and socialism, high school freshmen would be required to take a 100-question exam based on the civics test that prospective U.S. citizens take during the American naturalization process.

lumps the test into state-mandated American history and civics classes in public and accredited private and parochial schools, and students would have to pass the test before earning a diploma.

The bill passed the Senate on Thursday in a 26-14 vote. It also requires the State Board of Education to craft curricula that teaches K-12 public school students about “negative impacts of communist and socialist regimes and ideologies.”

The bill is rooted in conservative circles concerned about anti-Americanism and contested statistics that purport Gen Z Americans are attracted to communist and socialist ideals. Sen. Brad Starnes, a Riley Republican and former school superintendent, put forth the bill and assured the House Education Committee on Monday that neither the civics test nor the curricula will replace existing units on American history.

The committee on Tuesday approved an amendment to the bill to add fascism to the curricula.

Research on younger generations’ inclination toward socialist or communist causes is muddy. A 2019 Gallup poll found millennials and Gen Z, ages 18-39, . As a whole, however, Americans still than socialism.

Joshua Reynolds, a policy analyst for Cicero Action, a conservative think tank’s advocacy arm, backed the bill, citing three separate polls indicating favorable views of communism and socialism among 18-39 year olds.

Reynolds cited in testimony a 2020 poll from the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation that “63% of Gen Z and Millennials believe that the Declaration of Independence guarantees ‘freedom and equality’ better than the Communist Manifesto, compared to 95% of the Silent Generation.”

Leah Fliter, assistant executive director of advocacy for the Kansas Association of School Boards, said socialism and communism curriculum might be inappropriate and complex for early grades.

“We feel that this bill has been drafted without looking at the Kansas state standards for graduation,” she said Monday.

The Kansas State Board of Education already recommends instruction on communism and socialism, according to Monday testimony from board members Cathy Hopkins and Beryl New. The board, they wrote, “has established history, government and social studies standards that prepare students to be informed, thoughtful, engaged citizens as they enrich their communities, state, nation, world and themselves.”

If passed, both of the bill’s provisions would go into effect July 1, making next school year’s freshmen the first group to be required to pass the civics test as a condition of graduation.

During the naturalization process, most prospective U.S. citizens must complete an interview and citizenship test, which consists of an English portion and civics portion. People must answer at least 12 of 20 civics questions correctly, which are selected at random from a cache of about foundational American events, figures, principles and procedures. Kansas high school students would have to take a 100-question exam containing questions substantially similar to those that appear on the citizenship civics test, the bill said.

Arizona has required its high schoolers to pass a civics exam based on the U.S. citizenship test since 2017, and in 2026 raised the passing threshold, requiring students to answer at least 70 of 100 questions right instead of the original 60. Wisconsin has required the test since 2015.

Arizona only offers the test in English while Wisconsin offers versions in Spanish, Arabic, Chinese, Korean, Tagalog and Vietnamese.

The Kansas proposal does not specify a designated language. Students could request to take the test as early as seventh grade, and they can take it as many times as necessary to pass. Students must get an 80% or higher on the test to pass.

is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Kansas Reflector maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Sherman Smith for questions: info@kansasreflector.com.

]]>
NYC Parents Want Career Aptitude Assessments for All High Schoolers /article/nyc-parents-want-career-aptitude-assessments-for-all-high-schoolers/ Wed, 18 Feb 2026 19:30:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1028601 This article was originally published in

As New York City schools ramp up their focus on job readiness programs, a parent board overseeing high schools is calling on the Education Department to implement career aptitude assessments for all ninth and 11th graders.

“It helps with the ever popular question of ‘What do you want to be when you grow up?’” said Lawrence Lee, one of the sponsors . “It’s a big world with lots of different options and choices. I think many people look around and think their choices are only what they can see around them.”

, like other schools across the state and nation, are increasingly focusing on career education. There are more than 130 career and technical schools plus over 260 career and technical programs offering internships, apprenticeships, and job-focused courses across the five boroughs. But often, students are left to navigate a complicated application process without guidance on how various programs, electives, internships, career and technical tracks, and postsecondary paths might align with long-term goals, the high school council board members said. They believe the career aptitude assessments can help students reflect on their choices to improve how they select courses and work toward real-world goals.


Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ Newsletter


“By 11th grade, those decisions directly affect college applications, workforce credentials, and financial planning. Rather than leave those moments to chance, these assessments can give students the agency to better understand their own talents and to see multiple futures for themselves,” said Deborah Alexander, one of the resolution’s sponsors.

Education Department officials said they will review the resolution, but added they currently use platforms that offer interactive career exploration activities and generate tailored career options based on students’ interests.

“This career planning is also embedded in 1:1 advising, ensuring each high schooler receives personalized support in mapping out their next steps,” Education Department spokesperson Isla Gething said in a statement.

The high school council members want students to take “developmentally appropriate, research‐based” assessments in the fall of freshman year and spring of junior year, saying it will help provide more guidance especially for students from historically underserved communities and those learning English as a new language.

“Some students grow up surrounded by professionals who talk openly about their work and pathways, but many do not,” Alexander said. “That difference can shape who sees themselves as an engineer, a nurse, a filmmaker, an entrepreneur, or who never considers those possibilities at all.”

The online career assessment industry has exploded in recent years: An across the country use off-the-shelf advising tools from more than 20 companies, and many others use custom tech tools.

Some research suggests that career aptitude tools can help students better understand their strengths, that might otherwise not have been on their radar. Some experts suggest the tech tools can also help erode , when it comes to career advice.

But evidence of how effective these tools are remains scarce, which is why education research organization MDRC has embarked on a long-term analysis of two of the tech tools, expecting to release results in the summer. Though the tools offer schools a way to advise students without having to hire more counselors — doing deep dives into what kinds of careers fit a student’s aptitudes and personality as well as what kind of degree to pursue and potential salary ranges — they often need, said Rachel Rosen, a senior research associate at MDRC.

“They’re not perfect,” Rosen said of the tools. “They are better if there is a teacher or an adult who will take the information and really work closely with the students on understanding how it can help them think creatively about what the tools are saying.”

While MDRC researchers don’t yet have definitive answers on whether the tool helped reduce bias, they did find that by the time students take the assessments, they already have some of their own assumptions about who they are and what kinds of careers they might do, Rosen said.

“They felt like they knew themselves better than the tool,” she said, and while the tools still had potential, “they need some good adult guidance to go with them.”

Chalkbeat is a nonprofit news site covering educational change in public schools. This story was originally published by Chalkbeat. Sign up for their newsletters at .

]]>
Five States Praised for Aligning High School and College Math /article/five-states-praised-for-aligning-high-school-and-college-math/ Wed, 11 Feb 2026 20:27:54 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1028468 Five states — Georgia, California, Tennessee, Utah and Oregon — have better aligned high school and college math courses in recent years, with marked results, according to an equity-focused nonprofit.

Each has implemented at least one of five strategies to boost student participation and success in the subject, according to in its recent report. 


Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ Newsletter


Some, through these efforts, have reduced the need for remediation at the college level. This is particularly relevant for low-income students and those of color, who are more likely to be placed in these noncredit courses, which can derail their college trajectories. 

Shakiyya Bland, Just Equations director of educational partnerships. (Just Equations)

Concern over the issue has risen in recent years thanks to COVID: More than 900 students at the needed catch-up math classes in the fall of 2025 compared to just 32 five years earlier. And their lack of understanding wasn’t confined to high school: they were missing material they should have mastered in middle and Other universities reported similar problems.  

“Too often we spend a lot of energy discussing the challenges and constraints related to education or redesigning math,” said Shakiyya Bland, Just Equations’ director of educational partnerships. “This report highlights states that are doing the work, showing what’s possible — and showing results.” 

The report recognized efforts in other regions, too. The Virginia Community College System, for example, saw the need for remedial math plummet from 40% of incoming students to 4% between 2014 and 2021 after it changed how it judged college math readiness and how it teaches students who need additional help, Bland said. 

“Instead of a single placement test that pushed huge numbers into noncredit remedial tracks, colleges started using multiple measures like high school GPA and math coursework, expanding access for more students to go straight into college‑level math with added support,” she said. “That shift, from assuming students weren’t ready to assuming they could succeed with the right help, is what drove the big drop in ‘remedial’ placements.”

Just Equations cited five strategies states can implement to align mathematics from high school to college, including course co-design, where secondary and post-secondary instructors unite to craft high school math sequences.  

The organization said, too, universities should have transparent expectations for incoming freshmen so these students know what is expected of them for various college majors. 

Just Equations also touts the value of senior year transition or readiness courses for high school students: These classes, the organization observes, help ensure students can handle the challenge of college-level work. 

States might also offer dual enrollment courses which allow high school students to earn college credit, saving them time and money, Just Equations concluded. They can also work to ensure public universities recognize new high school mathematics offerings so students are properly credited for those classes. 

Georgia redesigned its math pathway through a partnership with K-12 and higher education math teachers to make sure new high school courses aligned with college entry requirements. The state also added several new courses for high school seniors, including Advanced Placement Statistics and Mathematics of Industry and Government. 

California had given students conflicting guidance about how many years of high school math they needed: State law demanded two while school districts often required three and some colleges recommended four. State universities are now more transparent about what is needed for college success in general and in specific majors.

Just Equations notes Tennessee’s efforts date back 18 years when its high school students were first required to complete four years of math, including Algebra II. The state’s mathematics offerings have been reworked numerous times since then and statistics has emerged as a valuable course for many.

Out West, Utah’s dual-enrollment program made college-level classes more accessible and affordable. The state also expanded the range of math pathways for high school students beyond college algebra, a course that relies heavily on algebraic procedures where students often struggle with the material and finding its relevancy.

Students may now opt for quantitative reasoning, focusing on practical numeracy skills such as personal finance and statistical reasoning or introductory statistics, geared toward life sciences, business and social sciences.

Mike Spencer, secondary mathematics specialist for the state board of education, said the change has been helpful to many students who might otherwise be kept out of college by their inability to pass a course that often had no bearing on their major or career aspiration. 

But, he said, students were reluctant to make the switch. 

“When it was first released, we saw a majority of our students were still taking college algebra, partly because of tradition,” Spencer said. “So, we made a significant effort to help inform students, families and counselors to understand why you would go into each of these.”

Just Equations noted, too, Utah’s university professors help craft high school syllabuses, screen high school teachers to teach college-level courses, and “verify grading consistency using common assessments.” It credits these and other changes for a massive increase in the rate of high school seniors completing four years of math, from 28% in 2012 to 87% in 2020. 

Bland of Just Equations said states should routinely bring together K–12, higher education, and workforce leaders to find the best math pathways for students. And, she said, they should invest in sustained professional development and K–16 longitudinal data to track students into the workforce to learn which math experiences best supported their success. 

Five years ago, Oregon adopted new mathematics standards intended to be “more modern and equitable,” moving away from the three-course sequence of Algebra I, geometry and Algebra II to a required two-year core curriculum focused on algebra, geometry and data/statistics. 

Students can now choose a course of study for a required third year — including mathematical modeling, data science and quantitative reasoning — and an optional fourth year. 

University of Oregon (Facebook)

The changes required colleges to revisit their stated requirements. The University of Oregon, for example, mandated Algebra II for all incoming students, but now requires three or more years of high school math, which “could be satisfied by any math course with a primary focus on concepts in algebra, calculus, data science, discreet mathematics, geometry, mathematical analysis, probability or statistics.” 

In addition to the five core states at the heart of the study, Just Equations also lauded North Carolina’s automatic enrollment policy, adopted in 2018, which places students who score high on state assessments into advanced mathematics courses for the following year, eliminating subjective recommendations. More than 95% of the state’s eighth-grade students who scored at the highest level were placed in advanced math courses in 2022–23, up from 87% in 2017–18, before the policy was enacted. 

While these states have made noteworthy progress, critics note problems remain. 

A lack of longitudinal data in Tennessee makes it difficult to understand the impact of the changes that have taken shape there, state officials say. 

“One of the goals that I have over the next year or so is to better track the entire arc of the student journey,” said Juliette Biondi, who directs the state’s Seamless Alignment and Integrated Learning Support program, as documented in the report. “I want to understand how they do in their college math classes. Do they struggle? Does it influence graduation rates?”

Utah, too, can also improve: Rural areas find it hard to recruit and retain qualified teachers for college-level courses, leading them to rely on virtual instruction.

And Jo Boaler, the Stanford professor who helped California reshape its math program, said she regularly observes ineffective teaching practices that undermine K-12 learning.

“All I can see is that we have not built conceptual understanding or number sense well by the end of school,” Boaler told ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ. “When I visit classrooms, I still see students going through uninspiring textbook math. Maybe there has been some improvement but I have not heard about it or seen it yet.”

Disclosure: The Gates Foundation provides financial support to Just Equations and ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ.

]]>
Rural Students Graduate HS More Than City Peers, but Attend College Less /article/rural-students-graduate-hs-more-than-city-peers-but-attend-college-less/ Sun, 28 Dec 2025 13:30:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1026462 Many high school seniors are currently in the midst of the college application process or are already waiting to hear back from their selected schools.

For high school students in rural parts of the United States, the frantic pace of the college application process can look a bit different. For starters, some of these rural students might not have large numbers of elite universities and colleges coming to admissions fairs in their areas. They might not have all of the required high school courses to attend some of these schools, either, according to , a scholar of educational leadership and rural education who graduated from a small, rural high school in Alabama.

Amy Lieberman, the education editor at The Conversation U.S., spoke with Williams to understand the particular experiences of rural students – and what, exactly, coming from a rural background can mean as students think about college.

How are rural high school students’ experiences unique?

Nationally, – or 1 in 5 public school students in the U.S. – attended rural schools in the fall of 2022.

Research suggests that at a higher rate than urban students.

While approximately 90% of rural high school students graduated in 2020, 82% of urban high school students got their .

But rural students’ college entrance rate is lower than that of urban and suburban students.

Within four years of graduating high school, 71% of rural students attended college, compared to 73% of suburban and 71% of city students who also went to college, according to by the National Center for Education Statistics.

at a higher rate than their suburban and urban peers but at a lower rate?

First, we know that some colleges are not really recruiting students in rural areas. If these universities don’t know you exist, and if your parents haven’t gone to college and don’t know how the admission system works, you might not have help as you move closer to attending college. Some have college counselors.

There are other reasons why some rural high school graduates are not going to college, I have personally seen. Some students are apprehensive about leaving home. They have close-knit families and communities, and they might be wondering where they fit in at a school in a large place that is much bigger than where they grew up.

Students in the West Bolivar High School marching band take part in the McEvans School homecoming parade in Shaw, Miss., in September 2022.
(Rory Doyle for The Washington Post via Getty Images)

Do any of these scenarios describe your own educational journey?

I grew up in a small town in Alabama and was different from some of the other Black students, since I came from a family of educators who had gone to college for two generations.

But when I did go to college, I went to a campus that was two times the size of my hometown, which has a population of just 12,000. It takes a confident student, as well as encouragement from parents or mentors, to believe that you can go to school away from home.

We had some college fairs in high school, but the visiting colleges were state universities and regional schools. You did not have selective schools coming to recruit.

Students today can learn about schools online, but there is still the issue that universities are not, on their own, .

Do rural students fit into universities’ diversity goals?

Only recently have people begun to think and talk more about what rural really means. Some people use the U.S. Census Bureau’s , which is “all population, housing, and territory not included within an urban area.”

But that’s a somewhat surface definition. It’s some scholars to , including me. It feels like something you have to experience and know, and that is hard to define. Part of the issue is that , and that makes it seem it doesn’t deserve its own definition.

Universities are beginning to think about these rural students more and the particular challenges they experience in school. That includes not necessarily having stable access to high-speed internet, which approximately and 27.7% of Americans in tribal areas don’t have, compared to only 1.5% of Americans in urban areas.

Another issue is that even for rural students who want to go to college, they might not have the right qualifications, such as certain courses they have completed.

I am currently involved in research with and education scholars and about how some rural high schools in Alabama and Mississippi aren’t able to teach physics or chemistry. Physics and chemistry are both gateway courses to college, and if you want to be an engineer or STEM major, you have to complete these courses in order to have a shot at certain colleges.

Rural high schools tend to have a lack of resources, in terms of both budget and their staffing. Schools not being able to find teachers who are qualified or certified in certain subject areas, such as science courses, . But , rural towns.

Schools will say they don’t have students interested in those subjects. But the states also aren’t requiring that these classes are offered.

This lack of science course offerings can create a whole block of students who are not going to college. And if we are talking about the South, in particular, and states that have a high population of Black students in rural areas, we are talking about a whole swath of students who don’t have this education and would find it a struggle to get into larger, splashier schools that are not near home.

High school students in rural areas might not have access to the same classes or technology that peers in suburban and urban areas do.
(Getty Images)

What do you think are some of the solutions to these challenges?

There are many local efforts to and things of that nature for students. Some of those efforts have been blunted because schools are funded by property taxes, and some of them just don’t have the revenue to pay for these add-ons without federal support.

I think colleges need to do a better job of recruiting students at rural high schools. I also think that once these students make it to college, it would help if there were support or affinity groups.

Some colleges have not thought enough about rural students. I think the narrative around rural students and college needs to shift – these students may want to go to college, but nobody is looking for them. When you live in small, geographically isolated places, sometimes you only know what you see.The Conversation

This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .

]]>
Opinion: Stop Ignoring the Leaders Who Can Transform High Schools /article/stop-ignoring-the-leaders-who-can-transform-high-schools/ Fri, 21 Nov 2025 15:30:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1023732 Amid growing calls for redefining the high school experience, there’s a critical missing link that is often overlooked: principals and assistant principals. Despite their influence over how time is used, which courses are offered, how teachers and counselors collaborate, and which business and college partners can engage with students, most school administrators simply aren’t trained, supported or held accountable for transforming their high schools. 

Their preparation and evaluation focuses disproportionately on compliance and core academics, not on whether students graduate ready for what comes next. The result is a system that sidelines the very leaders who could drive change. School-level leaders should be the chief architects of high school redesign and high-quality pathways, connecting what students learn in classrooms with the real skills, experiences and credentials they’ll need after graduation. 


Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ Newsletter


Decades of research confirm what common sense suggests: Effective principals and assistant principals drive student success. The has shown that principals are second only to teachers on their impact on student learning. More recent from the UChicago Consortium on School Research finds strong school leaders affect not only high school achievement but also students’ college enrollment and persistence.   

These findings are especially relevant now as educators and policymakers across the country rethink the purpose and structure of high school.  New efforts from the, the , and aim to align education with the demands of today’s economy — emphasizing skills, credentials, and experiences that prepare students for college, career and adult life. But these initiatives will falter if the people responsible for running high schools aren’t prepared.

Despite the key role they play,  principals rarely receive the training or guidance needed to lead this kind of redesign and must simultaneously manage competing district priorities.  of district leaders consistently rank math and reading scores, chronic absenteeism and teacher recruitment as top concerns, while expanding access to career and technical education or dual enrollment programs ranks near the bottom. 

The message seems to be that academic recovery matters, but preparing students for life after graduation is optional. As a result, high school redesign efforts often sit on the margins, disconnected from the day-to-day work of teaching and learning. Principals, pressed by urgent academic demands, lack the time, resources, or cover  to connect those priorities with students’ long-term goals.

If states and districts want high school redesign to succeed, they need to put principals and assistant principals at the center of those efforts. This means aligning preparation, expectations, and accountability around the idea that postsecondary readiness is not a separate responsibility but a core part of the work of principals and assistant principals. 

First, it’s important to break down the silos separating high school redesign from broader school improvement priorities.  Postsecondary readiness is school improvement. Focusing on instructional achievement isn’t mutually exclusive with improving career-connected learning or access to accelerated coursework.  

Matt Gandal, President of Education Strategy Group recently , “If we want to change the trajectory of student performance in high school, we have to do more to inspire them — including showing them the connection between what they’re learning in school and their future goals.” Vermont has developed a framework that shows how this is possible by including mechanisms to help principals and assistant principals plan for increasing access to advanced coursework. 

Second, pathway planning, counselor supervision and high-quality advising need to be part of state school leader standards.  Across states, school leadership standards rarely reference or outline the specific knowledge and skills that secondary principals should develop in order to effectively lead students to postsecondary and workforce success. When these outcomes become part of what schools are held accountable for, principals can lead them with purpose.  Illinois’ offers a strong model by explicitly including college and career readiness as a leadership competency.  

Third, and most critical, the initial preparation, ongoing coaching and peer networks for school leaders should all emphasize high school redesign and pathways.  Skim most state certification for principals and you’ll see mandatory classes on finance, instruction, child psychology and special education law. Licensure and preparation programs should treat college and career readiness as fundamental, not elective. Principals need to learn how to align schedules, curricula and partnerships to help every student graduate with a plan and the experiences to pursue it. They deserve ongoing coaching and peer networks that reinforce this vision.

Promising models exist and show a way forward. For example, since 2021-2022, the has partnered with over 300 school and district leaders through a multi-year coaching and professional learning partnership focused on the conditions that enable postsecondary readiness. This partnership is guided by an overarching research-based for leadership development oriented toward long-term student success. 

Reframing the principal’s job around students’ long-term readiness offers high returns. When principals connect academic learning with meaningful experiences such as dual enrollment, apprenticeships or credential programs, students are more likely to graduate with confidence and purpose. They see school as relevant to their future, not as a disconnected series of requirements. The cost of these changes is modest compared with their potential benefits. The estimates that comprehensive leadership development  can be implemented for about $42 per student. This cost is far less than the price of failed reforms. 

What’s missing is not evidence or funding but alignment: Policymakers and system leaders must decide that empowering principals to lead this work is worth the investment. High school redesign will not succeed through frameworks or pilot programs alone. It will succeed when principals have the preparation, authority and support to make postsecondary readiness central to their mission — and when states and districts create the conditions for them to do so.

Disclosure: ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ receive financial support from the Wallace Foundation.

]]>
How California is Trying to Reshape High School /article/how-california-is-trying-to-reshape-high-school/ Wed, 12 Nov 2025 17:30:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1023196 This article was originally published in

This story was originally published by . for their newsletters.

At CART High near Fresno, there is no gum stuck to the floor. The saffron-yellow walls are unmarred by graffiti. Toting laptops, students file calmly down spacious, light-filled hallways to classes like biotechnology and digital marketing. There’s no fighting, no shouting, no bells. No one even cuts class.

It’s hard to believe CART High is a public high school. But in the future, this may be a model for every high school in California.


Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ Newsletter


“We can see from the data that the big, old-fashioned factory model of high school – where students run from class to class with a locker as their only stable point of contact – is not succeeding,” said Linda Darling-Hammond, president of the State Board of Education. “We need to overhaul the whole idea of what high school can be, and right now we have an opportunity to do so.”

The California Collaborative for Educational Excellence, a state agency, is launching a to redesign high school and middle school. Groups of districts already working on escaping the factory model applied for grant money, and winners will meet, brainstorm, work through challenges and share their experiences statewide, in hopes of inspiring other districts to create innovative high school options. The money will come from $10 million recently allotted in the state budget, as well as state programs promoting career pathways and dual enrollment in high school.

The idea is to move beyond the traditional high school — with its rigid 50-minute periods and stand-alone classes — and replace it with a new type of school that offers work experience, academics tailored to students’ interests, stronger personal connections with staff and multidisciplinary courses that link directly to careers and community needs.

A group of students is sitting at a table set up in the center of a school hallway with saffron-yellow walls and classrooms.
A classroom of students seated at desks in rows with laptops in front of them, talking to each other during a class lesson.Students sit at tables in a hallway and in an engineering class at the Center for Advanced Research and Technology (CART) in Clovis on Oct. 6, 2025. (Larry Valenzuela/CalMatters/CatchLight Local)

“It should be a joy to go to school every day,” Darling-Hammond said. “That’s what we’re looking for.”

Countless schools in California use elements of this idea, with schools-within-schools that offer career academies or other specialized programs. But very few high schools are devoted completely to it.

How high school came to be

Public high schools have only existed for about a century in the U.S. Education for younger children has existed for hundreds of years, but the idea of school for teenagers only came about in the early 20th century. The original high schools were based loosely on a factory model of efficiency, with learning measured in Carnegie units — 120 hours spent over a year studying a particular topic. at the time in an effort to standardize education, the measure is still used at nearly all high schools and colleges.

But have shown that teenagers learn more in a flexible environment with plenty of hands-on projects and teamwork. Instead of sitting quietly at desks and listening to a teacher, students are more likely to be engaged if they’re allowed some autonomy to pursue topics they’re interested in, with their peers.

Alternative schools — typically, schools for students who aren’t succeeding in traditional school — have been experimenting with this approach for decades. The state’s aim to not only help students graduate, but also pair them with internships, teach them practical life skills and address their emotional well-being. They often have flexible schedules and small classes, with teachers getting to know students and their families personally.

There’s plenty of evidence that traditional high schools may be outdated. In the most recent , nearly half of 11th graders said school “is really boring.” Almost 25% of 11th graders were chronically absent last year.

Academically, the numbers were equally dismal. Just 30% of California 11th graders performed at or above grade level in math last year, with some student groups faring much worse. Although the graduation rate was 87%, fewer than half of those students had finished a college or career preparation track.

A person wearing glasses stands in front of a classroom of students seated at desks. The students are sitting in rows with laptops in front of them.
Physics instructor William Dunn teaches a lesson to students in an engineering class at the Center for Advanced Research and Technology (CART) in Clovis on Oct. 6, 2025. (Larry Valenzuela/CalMatters/CatchLight Local)

“The data speaks for itself,” said Russlynn Ali, head of XQ Institute, which advocates for high school redesign, and a former head of the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights under President Barack Obama. “There are young people today who’ve graduated from high school but can’t calculate the tip on a split bill, grasp the main idea in an op-ed piece. The case for change is unmistakeable.”

Transcripts and units

There are a few obstacles to transforming high schools statewide to look like CART. One is higher education. The University of California and California State University require high school students to pass a series of classes, known as A-G, to qualify for admission. Advocates for high school redesign say those requirements are too rigid, and high schools need some flexibility in creating new classes that are more interesting to students and more connected to life outside the classroom. They also say that traditional letter grades, which colleges rely on to admit students, are too limiting and that colleges need to consider a new kind of transcript that more accurately reflects students’ abilities.

Another obstacle is the Carnegie unit, which is an integral part of the way high schools and colleges are structured. Even the Carnegie Foundation has been , arguing that schools should measure students’ progress based on what they know, rather than how much time they’ve spent in a classroom. But so far, colleges have shown little interest in dropping the Carnegie unit.

A school for ‘the C kid’

CART High, which stands for Center for Advanced Research and Technology, opened about 25 years ago in a renovated water pump facility in Clovis. A joint initiative between Clovis Unified and Fresno Unified, the idea was to reach students who were floundering in school and give them some career experience that could also boost the local economy. It wasn’t quite an alternative school, but it wasn’t an honors program, either.

“We weren’t looking for the top students. We were looking for the disengaged kids,” said Staci Bynum, CART’s dean of curriculum and instruction who’s been at the school since its inception. “The C kid is going to excel here.”

CART is open to 11th and 12th graders from both districts, with students selected through a lottery. Last year, more than 2,200 students applied and 1,000 were accepted. Nearly 80% of CART’s enrollment is low-income.

An assortment of animal bones lies out on a large piece of white parchment, with blue index cards bearing numbers.
A person standing in front of a classroom of students holding up an animal skull while talking to the class. Bones of other animals can be seen on the desk in front of the students. In the background, some shelves and boxes are stacked behind the woman.First: An assortment of bones sits on a desk for students to identify during a forensic science lesson. Last: Forensic science Instructor Erin Andrade shows animal skulls to a classroom of students for a lesson at the Center for Advanced Research and Technology (CART) in Clovis on Oct. 6, 2025. (Larry Valenzuela/CalMatters/CatchLight Local)

Students spend half their day at their regular high school taking math, foreign language, art and other classes, and half their day at CART, where they choose an area of focus. Options include law and policy, business, forensics and psychology, among other topics.

Classes, which the school calls labs, are three hours long, and are taught by a trio of teachers who weave in literature and other academic subjects that are relevant to the subject. In biotechnology, for example, students read “The Andromeda Strain” and “The Martian,” and write their own science fiction stories based on concepts they’re learning in class. In the law class, students read Othello or Hamlet then subject characters to a mock trial.

“We work really hard to get kids to see the bigger picture of why they’re learning what they’re learning,” said English teacher Emily Saeteurn. “We want them to have that ‘aha!’ moment.”

A teacher wearing glasses and a white shirt stands in the center of their classroom with desks, bookshelves, and a projector screen in the background.
English teacher Emily Saeteurn at the Center for Advanced Research and Technology (CART) in Clovis on Oct. 6, 2025. (Larry Valenzuela/CalMatters/CatchLight Local)

Attendance is nearly 100% and discipline problems are almost unheard of, said principal Rick Watson. More than 90% of students scored at least “proficient” on the English portion of the Smarter Balanced test. Students take the math portion at their other high school.

When he’s not running the school, Watson is giving tours. Education officials from around the world often visit, in hopes of replicating the CART model. Numerous CART-inspired schools have opened around California.

“You have kids in comprehensive high schools everywhere who are falling through the cracks,” Watson said. “Comprehensive high schools don’t work for some B, C, D students. The students  have potential but they’re disconnected.They’re desperate for a different model of education.”

Senior Madelyn Quiroga, who’s in the biotechnology class, said she has mediocre grades at her regular high school, but all A’s at CART.

A person with long hair wearing a sweatshirt stands by a group of trees near a parking lot area outside of a school.
Student Madelyn Quiroga at the Center for Advanced Research and Technology (CART) in Clovis on Oct. 6, 2025. (Larry Valenzuela, CalMatters/CatchLight Local)

“At my other school, they just throw stuff at you and never really explain it. Here, they actually teach us,” she said. “And it’s all stuff we actually want to know, so it sticks in your brain. Like when I hear someone talk about CRISPR (gene editing technology), it’s like, ‘Oh, I know something about that.’”

Audrey Riede, an 11th grader in the law class, said she’s so inspired she wants to be a defense attorney.

“CART is way better than normal school,” she said. “The teachers aren’t just trying to get you to pass, they really want to make you think. It’s just a totally different environment.”

The state will announce the winning pilot proposals in November.

This article was and was republished under the license.

]]>
They Examined 3.3 Million Texts on Chronic Absenteeism. Here Are 4 Big Findings /article/they-examined-3-3-million-text-messages-on-chronic-absenteeism-here-are-4-big-findings/ Wed, 12 Nov 2025 12:01:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1023227 More than five years after the dawn of COVID-19, chronic absenteeism in U.S. schools remains high — at last count, it exceeded prepandemic levels for the fifth straight year. In about half of urban school districts, more than 30% of students were chronically absent, missing 10% or more of school days.

And bedrock attitudes about attendance seem to be changing. A recent noted that one in four students now doesn’t think being chronically absent from school “is a problem.” The study found that about 40% of school districts consider reducing chronic absenteeism among their top three most pressing challenges. One in 12 ranks it as their biggest challenge. 


Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ Newsletter


As school districts push to lower absenteeism rates, the software company , which helps schools keep track of students and communicate with parents, examined four years of its own attendance intervention data across hundreds of school districts. It analyzed 3.3 million text messages across 15 states, representing 88,000 students and 22,000 educators. 

In a , it finds that improving attendance often comes down to a handful of basic tasks. Here’s a breakdown of the key takeaways:

1: Early intervention works

Contacting families before students become chronically absent is crucial. Once a student crosses the 10% threshold, fixing their attendance becomes much harder, so intervening when students register just three to five absences is most effective. Contacting parents early with a letter improved attendance dramatically, reducing absence rates by 28%.

Researchers found that 51% of students whose families receive just one letter don’t need a second one. The “save rate” for these students suggests that many families simply don’t realize how quickly absences accumulate. 

2: Timing and communication methods matter

Joy Smithson

Parents are highly responsive to text messages, researchers found, with 73% of texts garnering a response from parents in just 11 minutes. They’ll engage with schools when communication is “accessible, timely and specific.”

“The method does matter,” said Joy Smithson, a SchoolStatus data scientist. “We get a lot higher rates of response with text messages.” Placing a phone call, on the other hand, is “for those more critical conversations,” she said.

Kara Stern, the company’s director of education, agreed. “Not every parent is in a position where they can pick up a phone call during the day. For many people, it might jeopardize your work situation, and so to assume that that’s the best way to reach a parent is not necessarily to be in tune with the actual realities of the parents in your community.”

SchoolStatus

The best times to text families, the data suggests, are either around 8 a.m., when parents and students are preparing for school, or 2-4 p.m., typically during pickup times. These align with natural breaks in parents’ daily routines, when they’re most likely to check their phones.

The best time of year to engage families is August or September. Parents who hear from schools early maintain higher response rates throughout the year — 77% vs. 71% — and respond, on average, one minute faster. By January, 33% of these parents are still engaging with schools, compared to just 16% of parents who first heard from schools later in the fall term. 

That suggests that early conversations “do extra work,” researchers maintain, establishing trust, opening communication channels and signaling to families that working together matters.

“It’s important to reach out at the beginning of the year, so that you’re not waiting for a crisis,” said Smithson, “because it’s too late to build a relationship at that point.”

3. Plain language outperforms edu-jargon

Researchers found that being specific about how much school a student has missed outperforms vague messages such as, “We’ve noticed some absences.” 

Direct offers of help, such as “Reply if you need support with transportation or health concerns,” also outperform lengthy explanations of attendance policy.

And when students are older, direct messages can be very effective.

“What this data shows us is that connection is really driving so much of a student’s experience,” said Stern. “When a school is able to reach out to the kid and say, ‘Hey, Greg, we missed you today, what’s going on? What do you need to help you come to school?’ that’s a really different experience than having a form letter appear at your house saying, ‘Greg has missed school six days.’” 

She added, “What I hope districts will take away from this report is that communication is intervention,” she said. “It’s not extra work. It’s the work that makes everything else stick.”

4: Three key moments merit extra attention

Students at three moments in their school careers are more likely to be chronically absent: in pre-K, sixth grade and high school. Stern called them “high alert moments.”

Surprisingly, pre-K students have the highest chronic absenteeism rates of any group, mostly due to the high frequency of illness and families underestimating the impact of missing school. 

Sixth grade is “the tipping point,” said Stern, with chronic absenteeism spiking by 3.3 percentage points from fifth to sixth grade, the sharpest increase across all grades.

Kara Stern

Smithson said middle-schoolers typically have more autonomy. They’re often getting their first mobile phones. And current sixth-graders, she said, were in kindergarten when COVID hit in 2020. “So just imagine knowing that patterns get established in kindergarten,” she said. For those kindergartners in 2020, school “really got disrupted,” with their baseline experience of school being “categorically different” from what it should have been.

And for many students, the transition from elementary school to middle school represents a shift from a safe, contained environment, where both students and parents are highly engaged, to a less personal one, with less consistency and connectivity, said Stern. Students “don’t know that there is someone who’s really paying attention, who cares that they’re there, who knows what’s happening with them, and so maybe it doesn’t really matter if they’re there or not.”

And middle school can also be the place where many students first experience bullying, which also worsens attendance.

In high school, chronic absence rates more than double, and students have lower response rates to traditional methods like letters, suggesting that schools should contact students directly — actually, they found that direct student messaging could work for students as young as 11. 

A text message to a high school freshman can start a conversation that wouldn’t happen otherwise. Pairing these messages with notes to parents can improve response rates in these critical years, researchers found.

“The chronic absenteeism numbers in high school suggest that kids are really voting with their feet,” said Stern. “And so one way to get them back would be to invite them in to be part of the solution, to say, ‘What is it that is not meeting your needs? How can we include your voice in the process of making high school what you want it to be?’”

In many ways, the new findings echo what researchers like Johns Hopkins University’s and have long suggested. Chang, the founder and executive director of the nonprofit , said Wednesday’s report “reflects what we know from common sense and research. Improving attendance is possible when we use data to take early action as well as determine where we should invest in building relationships so we can partner with students and families to encourage showing up, monitor absences, and address barriers to getting to school.”

But Chang said that while timely, data-informed engagement of families is essential, “it is not always sufficient and should be combined with other strategies for identifying and addressing barriers to getting to school.” Those barriers could exist in the community or in schools and should be addressed in “a comprehensive, systemic approach.”

She suggested that of interventions is sometimes necessary, including “intensive interventions” for students who miss more than 20% of school days. It could include housing supports, a student attendance review board, a community-based, non-criminal truancy court, individualized learning and success plans and even, as a last resort, legal intervention.

Stern and Smithson said the findings boil down, in a larger sense, to the importance of what they call “active noticing” about attendance. 

“I really think that it would be a big plus for faculties to actively notice every week and go through their rosters,” said Stern. “‘Who do we not know? Who can’t speak about this child? Who doesn’t know anything about this student’s life after school? We have someone that we need to actually pay attention to learning more about — who’s suddenly not coming to school, who’s turned it around and suddenly being there?’ ” 

Smithson said the biggest takeaway for educators is that “Timing is everything. Do not wait. Act with urgency. It’s about building those relationships, and it’s just so important — and it’s so important to start right away.”

]]>
More South Carolina Students Are Graduating, But Many Aren’t Ready for Life After High School /article/more-south-carolina-students-are-graduating-but-many-arent-ready-for-life-after-high-school/ Sun, 09 Nov 2025 16:01:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1023017 This article was originally published in

COLUMBIA — South Carolina high schools posted their highest graduation rate in a decade, but a quarter of students still aren’t ready for college or the workforce, according to released Monday.

Generally, South Carolina’s schools improved , according to the statewide data that gauges how well schools perform based on test scores, classroom surveys and student growth, among other metrics. Education officials applauded a 10-year high in the number of students graduating on time — meaning they graduated four years after entering ninth grade — while saying they would continue pushing for programs to improve how well those students were prepared for life after high school.

“We have to make sure that our diplomas are worth more than the piece of paper that they are written on,” said state Superintendent Ellen Weaver.


Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ Newsletter


Overall, 270 schools rated “excellent” this year, an increase from 232 last year. The bottom tier of “unsatisfactory” decreased from 49 to 31, and “below average” schools dropped from 186 to 145.

Any time the number of schools in the lowest tier shrinks, that’s good news, since it means children across the state are getting a better education, said Patrick Kelly, a lobbyist with the Palmetto State Teachers Association.

“There’s encouraging information here,” Kelly said of the report cards.

Officials from the state Department of Education and the independent Education Oversight Committee, which is tasked by state law with grading schools, announced the results at Annie Burnside Elementary School in Columbia, which jumped two tiers this year, from “average” to “excellent.”

At the Richland District One school, 83% of the 306 students live in poverty. The school’s big rating boost was due to significant student improvement, as shown by their test scores, and results on a survey about the school’s general environment, according to its report card.

“Our academic gains are no coincidence,” said Principal Janet Campbell. “They are the result of setting measurable goals, challenging our students to reach them and supporting them along the way.”

Graduation rates and readiness

This year, 87% of high schoolers graduated on time, up from 85% last year. That’s worth celebrating, Kelly said.

“Our goal should be for every student in South Carolina who has the ability to earn a high school diploma,” he said.

Three-quarters of students were ready for either college or a career after graduation, a gain of 3 percentage points, . Less than a third were ready for both.

Although the gap between students who are graduating and those who are prepared for what comes next continues to shrink slightly, state officials remain concerned about it, Weaver said.

“At the end of the day, we want our students, when they leave a South Carolina high school, to know that that diploma that they carry is a diploma of value,” Weaver said. “This is a diploma that is going to ensure that they are ready to go onto whatever post-secondary success looks like for them.”

All 11th graders in the state take a test assessing skills commonly needed for jobs, divided into four areas: math, reading, understanding data and “soft skills,” which include aspects of a job such as dressing professionally and working well with others. Results are graded from 1 to 5, with higher scores suggesting students are ready to pursue more careers.

Students are considered career-ready if they receive a score of 3 or higher on that test, earn a technical education certificate, complete a state-approved internship or receive a high enough score on the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery to enlist in the military. This year, 73% of students met that benchmark, compared to 70% last year, according to report card data.

College readiness is based on a student’s score on the ACT or SAT college entrance exam, college credit earned through a dual-enrollment course and/or scores on end-of-course Advanced Placement tests.

One-third of graduating students were college-ready, which is on par with at least the past five years, according to state data. The rate of high school students applying for college also continued to decrease, with 59% reporting filling out applications this year, compared with 61% last year.

A gap between graduation rate and readiness for the next step suggests schools are sometimes passing students without actually imparting the skills they need to succeed in life, Kelly said.

For instance, district policies setting teachers can give makes it easier for students to pass their classes, even if they haven’t actually done the work, Kelly said. Alternatives for students who fail tests or classes are sometimes easier, meaning a student can catch up without actually learning the same skills as their peers, he said.

“We’ve put some policies in place that make it harder to evaluate what a student knows and can do,” Kelly said.

Beginning this school year, students can follow a so-called pathway to that build on each other every year, allowing students to learn more advanced skills meant to make it easier to find a job in the field they want to pursue, said , chair of the Education Oversight Committee’s governing board.

“At the same time, we recognize that strengthening the system must go hand-in-hand with addressing the barriers that keep students from wholly engaging in school,” said Allen, who’s also a government relations director for Continental Tire.

Chronic absenteeism and test scores

For example, the number of students who missed at least 10 days of school this year remained a concern, Allen said.

Around 23% of students were chronically absent, essentially the same number as last year. The more days of school a student misses, the less likely they are to perform as expected for their grade level on end-of-year tests, the committee put out last year.

Those tests, in turn, play a role in determining how well a school or a district is performing. Officials and teachers’ advocates credited the Palmetto Literacy Project and a change in how early educators for improving English scores, but , with less than half of third- through eighth-graders able to perform on grade level, according to state testing data.

Just over half the state’s high school students scored at least a C, which is a 70%, on their end-of-course Algebra I exams, often taken freshman year, according to report card data. Nearly 69% passed their English 2 exams, typically taken sophomore year.

While rooting for improvement, teachers’ advocates also warned against depending too heavily on a single exam score in deciding how well teachers and students are performing. A single, high-pressure exam at the end of the year is not necessarily the best indicator of school performance, said Dena Crews, president of the South Carolina Education Association.

“If people are making judgments based on that, they’re missing a whole lot about schools and districts,” Crews said.

Teacher support

The Department of Education plans to focus on teachers in 2026, Weaver said.

“The No. 1 thing that we have to do to support student learning is take care of our teachers,” Weaver said.

She is asking legislators to raise the minimum pay for a first-year teacher to $50,000, up from $48,500. Legislators have increased the pay floor in increments for years, with the stated goal of reaching $50,000.

Weaver is also asking for $5 million to continue a that based on how well their students perform on tests. She also wants to start a program that offers extra pay to exceptional teachers who mentor others. The additional responsibility would be another way to earn more money without leaving the classroom to go into school administration, she said.

Supporting teachers is key in improving how well schools are performing, Kelly said. The promising results in this year’s report cards came after the first since 2019, he added.

“It should not be a surprise to see school performance improve as teacher vacancies go down,” Kelly said.

is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. SC Daily Gazette maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Seanna Adcox for questions: info@scdailygazette.com.

]]>
AI Mistakes a Doritos Bag for Gun at Baltimore High School /article/ai-mistakes-a-doritos-bag-for-gun-at-baltimore-high-school/ Thu, 06 Nov 2025 20:02:07 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1023047
]]>