Exclusive: New Research Strengthens Case for Virtual Tutoring
John Hopkins study found that first graders who received services were still on track in reading a year later with no additional help.
;)
Education news and commentary, delivered right to your inbox.
Sign up for 社区黑料 newsletter.
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for 社区黑料 Newsletter
When schools flocked to tutoring in response to pandemic learning loss, experts initially said they preferred in-person sessions.
But new studies bolster the evidence that done well, virtual models can be just as effective at moving students forward as face-to-face instruction.
In Massachusetts, first graders who spent 15 minutes a day online with a tutor from stayed on track a year later without additional tutoring, according to exclusively with 社区黑料. Students gained, on average, at least five additional months of learning over their expected growth.
Another virtual program, , produced positive results for the lowest-performing students in the Kansas City, Missouri, schools. Students who received one-on-one tutoring from certified teachers made greater progress than those who didn鈥檛 receive the extra help, .听
鈥淰irtual models are getting stronger,鈥� said Amanda Neitzel, an associate professor at Johns Hopkins University and author of the Ignite Reading study. 鈥淚f you go back just a few years, we had no examples of evidence-proven models and now we are getting them.鈥�
In addition to following Ignite Reading for two years, she recently published a study showing that elementary school students in Texas and Louisiana who received virtual tutoring from , outperformed their peers and gained nearly three additional months of learning.
Results like those have broadened the conversation about how to bring students who are missing critical reading skills up to speed.
鈥淭utoring can work in many ways and in different settings,鈥� Kevin Huffman, CEO of Accelerate, said earlier this month at the nonprofit鈥檚 annual conference.
When the organization began funding tutoring research four years ago, there were doubts, he said, about whether virtual programs could compete with in-person models. There鈥檚 more confidence in online versions now, but as with tutoring in general, progress depends on whether providers feature the components of a high-dosage program 鈥� meaning they were offered for roughly 90 minutes a week, during the school day with a trained tutor. Ensuring kids get all the tutoring hours a program is designed to deliver is also key.
鈥淲e obsess over student attendance,鈥� said Jessica Reid Sliwerski, Ignite Reading’s founder. Now in 24 states, the program focuses on building phonics skills and reading fluency.
In the Johns Hopkins Ignite Reading study, which focused on 13 Massachusetts school districts, 85% of students who mastered foundational reading skills 鈥渄uring the crucial first grade window鈥� were still keeping up at the end of second grade, Neitzel wrote. But if students didn鈥檛 meet expectations on time, they couldn鈥檛 catch up. Some were just too far behind.
鈥淢any kids start our program still not knowing basic kindergarten skills, like letter names and sounds,鈥� Sliwerski said. That means tutors have two years of content to get through.
To Sliwerski, the findings demonstrate that third grade, when many states decide whether students are strong enough readers to advance, is too late to intervene. If kids struggle to decode unfamiliar words, they won鈥檛 be able to comprehend more complex reading assignments.
鈥淲e are so caught up in 鈥榬eading by grade three鈥� that we aren鈥檛 honoring that kids are actually supposed to have fully cracked the code and be able to fluently read grade-level text at the end of first grade,鈥� she said. 鈥淲e act like kids have all the time in the world, when they don鈥檛.鈥�
The 5,700-student Chelsea Public Schools was among the Massachusetts districts using Ignite Reading as part of a project funded by One8, a nonprofit that helped schools get high-dosage tutoring off the ground. The state the program.
At first, 鈥渙ur teachers were a little skeptical,鈥� said Superintendent Almi Abeyta, a former kindergarten and first grade teacher. 鈥淭hey were like, 鈥榃e just got off of remote learning. Why are we going to put kids on a computer again?鈥� 鈥�
Then they saw the data. Students made similar gains on DIBELS, a widely used early literacy assessment, whether they were Black, Hispanic, English learners or had a disability, the study found.
鈥楢 great opportunity鈥�
Results like those are why the Fallbrook Union Elementary School District, near San Diego, California, is now spreading the program to all of its elementary schools as part of its First Grade Promise initiative.
In a pilot, Fallbrook STEM Academy, which serves a high-poverty population, enrolled 20 second graders in the program. Many of the students speak Spanish at home, didn鈥檛 attend preschool and lack access to books, flash cards and other early reading materials, said Principal Ana Arias. She called each parent to ask that they get their children to school a little early so they could meet with a tutor.
鈥淚 phrased it as an opportunity 鈥� a great opportunity 鈥� but I needed their commitment,鈥� Arias said. 鈥淲e have so many kids in the classroom and there’s so much need. It’s very rare to have a teacher meet one-on-one with a student every single day.鈥�
At the beginning of this school year, the 20 students were reading at a kindergarten level. By November, 19 had advanced to a first grade level, and she鈥檚 hoping they鈥檒l be on par with their peers by the end of the school year.
鈥楾ranscend time zones鈥�
The latest findings build on those that Harvard University and City University of New York researchers published last year. Whether tutoring is remote or in-person, , matters less than whether the tutor is well qualified and students attend sessions regularly.
Virtual models even have some advantages over in-person programs, experts say. Schools have to pay an in-person tutor whether or not the student is present. But virtual programs 鈥渢ranscend time zones,鈥� Sliwerski said, and can redeploy a tutor to meet with another student.
If the tutor is absent, 鈥渨e have a substitute ready to go,鈥� she said. 鈥淭he technology underpinning the program ensures the child receives the exact lesson they were supposed to get.鈥�
In Kansas City, consistency was key to the strong results. Students in first through fourth grade across 14 schools met with their tutors for 30-minute sessions at least three times a week for 20 weeks during the 2024-25 school year. The more sessions completed, the stronger the growth. Some students gained more than two months of additional learning and were less likely to be placed in special education.
On average, the students who participated in the Hoot program and those in the comparison group began the school year two grade levels behind. While many are still struggling readers, their progress was significant, said Carly Robinson, a senior researcher at Stanford University and a co-author of the study.
鈥淭his wasn’t a boutique pilot,鈥� she said. 鈥淚t’s tutoring operating inside a district system that is messy, and it still proved to be effective.鈥�
The district had to contend with technical glitches and unexpected snow days that forced students to miss some sessions.
Not all virtual programs have been able to overcome disruptions.
In a large suburban district in Texas, some students meeting with virtual tutors during the 2021-22 school year did worse in reading than their peers who didn鈥檛 receive the intervention. Scheduling conflicts, like school assemblies, and tutor turnover, contributed to the disappointing results.
鈥楢 higher bar鈥�
Those challenges grow even more complex in the middle grades with electives and block schedules where students don鈥檛 have the same classes every day. But Rahul Kalita, co-founder of Tutored by Teachers, said maintaining relationships between tutors and students is essential.
He hopes to contribute to the research base on virtual tutoring by participating in a randomized controlled study, funded by Accelerate and focused on math in two large Indianapolis middle schools.
鈥淚t felt like the right opportunity to test our model under a higher bar of rigor,鈥� he said.
On top of virtual programs refining their practices, districts, he said, 鈥渉ave also become more sophisticated buyers of tutoring.鈥� Multiple districts across the country pay providers higher rates if students make measurable progress or pass state tests.
In addition, there鈥檚 growing agreement that literacy tutoring, whether virtual or not, is more effective if it’s part of a strong early reading program that includes a curriculum based on the science of reading and screening students for dyslexia or other learning difficulties.
鈥淵ou can鈥檛 throw tutoring at the problem,鈥� Sliwerski said at the Accelerate conference. 鈥淚t has to be part of a very intentional system.鈥�
Did you use this article in your work?
We鈥檇 love to hear how 社区黑料鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.
